» Articles » PMID: 33028324

Adherence to Breast Cancer Guidelines is Associated with Better Survival Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EU Countries

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) clinical guidelines offer evidence-based recommendations to improve quality of healthcare for patients with or at risk of BC. Suboptimal adherence to recommendations has the potential to negatively affect population health. However, no study has systematically reviewed the impact of BC guideline adherence -as prognosis factor- on BC healthcare processes and health outcomes. The objectives are to analyse the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes and on healthcare costs.

Methods: We searched systematic reviews and primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase, conducted in European Union (EU) countries (inception to May 2019). Eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and crosschecked by a second. We used random-effects meta-analyses to examine the impact of guideline adherence on overall survival and disease-free survival, and assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE.

Results: We included 21 primary studies. Most were published during the last decade (90%), followed a retrospective cohort design (86%), focused on treatment guideline adherence (95%), and were at low (80%) or moderate (20%) risk of bias. Nineteen studies (95%) examined the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes, while two (10%) on healthcare cost. Adherence to guidelines was associated with increased overall survival (HR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.59-0.76) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.35, 95%CI 0.15-0.82), representing 138 more survivors (96 more to 178 more) and 336 patients free of recurrence (73 more to 491 more) for every 1000 women receiving adherent CG treatment compared to those receiving non-adherent treatment at 5 years follow-up (moderate certainty). Adherence to treatment guidelines was associated with higher costs, but adherence to follow-up guidelines was associated with lower costs (low certainty).

Conclusions: Our review of EU studies suggests that there is moderate certainty that adherence to BC guidelines is associated with an improved survival. BC guidelines should be rigorously implemented in the clinical setting.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO ( CRD42018092884 ).

Citing Articles

A Retrospective Chart Analysis Comparing Breast Cancer Detection Rates Between Annual Versus Biennial Mammograms.

Patel P, Sakhi H, Kalvapudi D, Changas A, Sulaimanov M, Gutierrez B J Clin Med Res. 2025; 16(12):608-624.

PMID: 39759488 PMC: 11699865. DOI: 10.14740/jocmr6081.


Staging for Breast Cancer: A Comparison Between Old and New Approaches.

Kirn V, Bors S, Fridrich C, Schumacher C, Thangarajah F Cancer Diagn Progn. 2023; 3(6):673-677.

PMID: 37927808 PMC: 10619575. DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10271.


Quality indicators for systemic anticancer therapy services: a systematic review of metrics used to compare quality across healthcare facilities.

Leung K, McLeod M, Torode J, Ilbawi A, Chakowa J, Bourbeau B Eur J Cancer. 2023; 195:113389.

PMID: 37924649 PMC: 10697827. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113389.


Characteristics and impact of interventions to support healthcare providers' compliance with guideline recommendations for breast cancer: a systematic literature review.

Ricci-Cabello I, Carvallo-Castaneda D, Vasquez-Mejia A, Alonso-Coello P, Saz-Parkinson Z, Parmelli E Implement Sci. 2023; 18(1):17.

PMID: 37217955 PMC: 10201699. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01267-2.


Novel computational biology modeling system can accurately forecast response to neoadjuvant therapy in early breast cancer.

Peterson J, Cole J, Pfeiffer J, Norris G, Zhang Y, Lopez-Ramos D Breast Cancer Res. 2023; 25(1):54.

PMID: 37165441 PMC: 10170712. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01654-z.


References
1.
Moons K, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Grobbee D, Altman D . Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?. BMJ. 2009; 338:b375. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b375. View

2.
Ament S, de Groot J, Maessen J, Dirksen C, van der Weijden T, Kleijnen J . Sustainability of professionals' adherence to clinical practice guidelines in medical care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(12):e008073. PMC: 4710818. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008073. View

3.
Andreano A, Rebora P, Valsecchi M, Russo A . Adherence to guidelines and breast cancer patients survival: a population-based cohort study analyzed with a causal inference approach. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 164(1):119-131. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4210-z. View

4.
Iorio A, Spencer F, Falavigna M, Alba C, Lang E, Burnand B . Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients. BMJ. 2015; 350:h870. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h870. View

5.
Henry N, Henry L, Hayes D, Ramsey S, Hortobagyi G, Barlow W . Promoting quality and evidence-based care in early-stage breast cancer follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014; 106(4):dju034. PMC: 4311189. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju034. View