» Articles » PMID: 33027915

Cyber and Offline Dating Abuse in a Portuguese Sample: Prevalence and Context of Abuse

Overview
Date 2020 Oct 8
PMID 33027915
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The increasing use of information and communication technologies (ICT) and networking has promoted the occurrence of different forms of victimization, specifically in terms of interpersonal interaction (e.g., cyberbullying or online risk-taking behaviour), which also includes cyber dating abuse (CDA). Some studies report that CDA is an extension of offline dating abuse (ODA). Because Portuguese studies in this area are scarce, this study aims to bridge this knowledge gap, seeking to investigate the extent and the context of CDA occurrence, and the relationship between CDA and all forms of ODA, i.e., physical, verbal-emotional and control. A convenience sample of 173 Portuguese adolescents and young adults was studied. This sample is mostly female (86.7%), has a mean (M) age of 25.36 years old and a standard deviation (SD) of 6.88 years of age. The results show that CDA and ODA among the Portuguese are very prevalent and related. Control (31.8 vs. 20.8%) and verbal-emotional ODA (26.7 vs. 20.2%) as well as control CDA (38.2 vs. 43.4%) were the most prevalent forms of abuse, either in terms of victimization or in terms of perpetration. The results also showed that CDA usually appears in a context of jealousy, also explaining control CDA and CDA direct aggression. A significant relationship between control CDA and CDA direct aggression and physical, verbal-emotional and control ODA was found. Experiencing control and verbal-emotional ODA are the main risk factors of control CDA victimization. This study allows to lay the groundwork for further research on dating victimization and perpetration through ICT, and has important practical implications at the level of Portuguese prevention strategies and intervention policies, thus emphasizing the role of the official authorities and the law itself.

Citing Articles

Cyber Dating Violence Among Youth and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Erbicer E, Boranli E, Metin A, Erbicer S, Sen S, Demirtas E J Youth Adolesc. 2024; 54(3):625-648.

PMID: 39283366 DOI: 10.1007/s10964-024-02082-8.


Psychosocial determinants of adolescents' attitudes toward disclosing dating violence.

Sianko N, Kunkel D, Burke S, Duncan S, Small M Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2024; 95(2):126-139.

PMID: 38976389 PMC: 11863568. DOI: 10.1037/ort0000769.


Evaluating Female Experiences of Electronic Dating Violence in Jordan: Motivations, Consequences, and Coping Strategies.

Alsawalqa R Front Psychol. 2021; 12:719702.

PMID: 34916986 PMC: 8669046. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719702.

References
1.
Munoz-Rivas M, Grana J, OLeary K, Gonzalez M . Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: prevalence, justification, and health consequences. J Adolesc Health. 2007; 40(4):298-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.11.137. View

2.
Van Ouytsel J, Ponnet K, Walrave M . Cyber Dating Abuse: Investigating Digital Monitoring Behaviors Among Adolescents From a Social Learning Perspective. J Interpers Violence. 2018; 35(23-24):5157-5178. DOI: 10.1177/0886260517719538. View

3.
Zweig J, Dank M, Yahner J, Lachman P . The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. J Youth Adolesc. 2013; 42(7):1063-77. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8. View

4.
Reidy D, Ball B, Houry D, Holland K, Valle L, Kearns M . In Search of Teen Dating Violence Typologies. J Adolesc Health. 2015; 58(2):202-7. PMC: 5860637. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.028. View

5.
Gracia-Leiva M, Puente-Martinez A, Ubillos-Landa S, Gonzalez-Castro J, Paez-Rovira D . and Heterosexual Dating Violence, Perceived Attachment to Parents and Peers and Suicide Risk in Young Women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(9). PMC: 7246745. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093174. View