» Articles » PMID: 33027310

Prevalence Threshold (ϕe) and the Geometry of Screening Curves

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Oct 7
PMID 33027310
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The relationship between a screening tests' positive predictive value, ρ, and its target prevalence, ϕ, is proportional-though not linear in all but a special case. In consequence, there is a point of local extrema of curvature defined only as a function of the sensitivity a and specificity b beyond which the rate of change of a test's ρ drops precipitously relative to ϕ. Herein, we show the mathematical model exploring this phenomenon and define the prevalence threshold (ϕe) point where this change occurs as: [Formula: see text] where ε = a + b. From the prevalence threshold we deduce a more generalized relationship between prevalence and positive predictive value as a function of ε, which represents a fundamental theorem of screening, herein defined as: [Formula: see text] Understanding the concepts described in this work can help contextualize the validity of screening tests in real time, and help guide the interpretation of different clinical scenarios in which screening is undertaken.

Citing Articles

The pulmonary contusion score: Development of a simple scoring system for blunt lung injury.

Toelle L, McNickle A, Feery D, Mohammed S, Chestovich P, Batra K Surg Pract Sci. 2025; 17():100247.

PMID: 39845634 PMC: 11749804. DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100247.


Open-Access 12-Minute MRI Screening for Acute Appendicitis: A Five-Year Retrospective Observational Study of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Jones A, Nol J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685716 PMC: 11642492. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237257.


Experimental interpretation of adequate weight-metric combination for dynamic user-based collaborative filtering.

Okyay S, Aygun S PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024; 7:e784.

PMID: 39553537 PMC: 11566190. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.784.


Diagnostic Validation of the Updated Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk II for Acute Kidney Injury Prediction Model in Pediatric Septic Shock.

Stanski N, Zhang B, Cvijanovich N, Fitzgerald J, Bigham M, Jain P Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024; 25(11):1005-1016.

PMID: 39115853 PMC: 11534533. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003589.


Diagnostic Identification of Acute Brain Dysfunction in Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock in the Electronic Health Record: A Comparison of Four Definitions in a Reference Dataset.

Alcamo A, Becker A, Barren G, Hayes K, Pennington J, Curley M Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024; 25(8):740-747.

PMID: 38738953 PMC: 11300159. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003529.


References
1.
Sackett D . Screening for early detection of disease: to what purpose?. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1975; 51(1):39-52. PMC: 1749624. View

2.
Smith J, Winkler R, Fryback D . The first positive: computing positive predictive value at the extremes. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132(10):804-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00008. View

3.
Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Dery V . Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86(4):317-9. PMC: 2647421. DOI: 10.2471/blt.07.050112. View

4.
Moons K, van Es G, Deckers J, Habbema J, Grobbee D . Limitations of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and bayes' theorem in assessing diagnostic probabilities: a clinical example. Epidemiology. 1997; 8(1):12-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199701000-00002. View

5.
Brenner H, Gefeller O . Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Stat Med. 1997; 16(9):981-91. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<981::aid-sim510>3.0.co;2-n. View