» Articles » PMID: 33026534

Sports-related Lower Limb Muscle Injuries: Pattern Recognition Approach and MRI Review

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Oct 7
PMID 33026534
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Muscle injuries of the lower limbs are currently the most common sport-related injuries, the impact of which is particularly significant in elite athletes. MRI is the imaging modality of choice in assessing acute muscle injuries and radiologists play a key role in the current scenario of multidisciplinary health care teams involved in the care of elite athletes with muscle injuries. Despite the frequency and clinical relevance of muscle injuries, there is still a lack of uniformity in the description, diagnosis, and classification of lesions. The characteristics of the connective tissues (distribution and thickness) differ among muscles, being of high variability in the lower limb. This variability is of great clinical importance in determining the prognosis of muscle injuries. Recently, three classification systems, the Munich consensus statement, the British Athletics Muscle Injury classification, and the FC Barcelona-Aspetar-Duke classification, have been proposed to assess the severity of muscle injuries. A protocolized approach to the evaluation of MRI findings is essential to accurately assess the severity of acute lesions and to evaluate the progression of reparative changes. Certain MRI findings which are seen during recovery may suggest muscle overload or adaptative changes and appear to be clinically useful for sport physicians and physiotherapists.

Citing Articles

Quantitative evaluation of the effects of several weeks of static stretching on the flexibility of the rectus femoris using shear wave elastography: a before-after study.

Ebihara B, Miyasaka H, Fukaya T, Mutsuzaki H J Ultrason. 2024; 24(98):1-6.

PMID: 39619262 PMC: 11608070. DOI: 10.15557/jou.2024.0025.


Magnetic resonance classification proposal for medial gastrocnemius muscle injuries.

Isern-Kebschull J, Pedret C, Garcia-Diez A, Amo M, Balius R, Alomar X Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(11):7958-7968.

PMID: 39544471 PMC: 11558490. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-298.


The Effects of Dry-Needling Therapy on the Quality of Life in Athletes with Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Repeated Measures Design Study.

Pavlovic B, Toskic L, Cicovic V, Cicovic B, Stankovic V J Clin Med. 2024; 13(17).

PMID: 39274182 PMC: 11395707. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13174969.


Characterization of acute effects of football competition on hamstring muscles by muscle functional MRI techniques.

Mecho S, Palomar-Garcia A, Wong M, Gallego J, Lopez F, Valle X PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0308328.

PMID: 39190697 PMC: 11349227. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308328.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging Patterns of Common Injuries in Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes.

Uppstrom T, Pascual-Leone N, Bram J, Bennett D, Kolin D, Greditzer 4th H HSS J. 2024; 20(3):390-401.

PMID: 39108444 PMC: 11299320. DOI: 10.1177/15563316241233578.


References
1.
Gillies A, Lieber R . Structure and function of the skeletal muscle extracellular matrix. Muscle Nerve. 2011; 44(3):318-31. PMC: 3177172. DOI: 10.1002/mus.22094. View

2.
Jarvinen T, Jarvinen T, Kaariainen M, Kalimo H, Jarvinen M . Muscle injuries: biology and treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(5):745-64. DOI: 10.1177/0363546505274714. View

3.
Siriwanarangsun P, Statum S, Biswas R, Bae W, Chung C . Ultrashort time to echo magnetic resonance techniques for the musculoskeletal system. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2017; 6(6):731-743. PMC: 5219960. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2016.12.06. View

4.
Reurink G, Almusa E, Goudswaard G, Tol J, Hamilton B, Moen M . No association between fibrosis on magnetic resonance imaging at return to play and hamstring reinjury risk. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(5):1228-34. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515572603. View

5.
Flores D, Mejia Gomez C, Estrada-Castrillon M, Smitaman E, Pathria M . MR Imaging of Muscle Trauma: Anatomy, Biomechanics, Pathophysiology, and Imaging Appearance. Radiographics. 2017; 38(1):124-148. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170072. View