» Articles » PMID: 33016008

Recruitment and Retention of Participants in UK Surgical Trials: Survey of Key Issues Reported by Trial Staff

Overview
Journal BJS Open
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Oct 5
PMID 33016008
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recruitment and retention of participants in surgical trials is challenging. Knowledge of the most common and problematic issues will aid future trial design. This study aimed to identify trial staff perspectives on the main issues affecting participant recruitment and retention in UK surgical trials.

Methods: An online survey of UK surgical trial staff was performed. Respondents were asked whether or not they had experienced a range of recruitment and retention issues, and, if yes, how relatively problematic these were (no, mild, moderate or serious problem).

Results: The survey was completed by 155 respondents including 60 trial managers, 53 research nurses, 20 trial methodologists and 19 chief investigators. The three most common recruitment issues were: patients preferring one treatment over another (81·5 per cent of respondents); clinicians' time constraints (78·1 per cent); and clinicians preferring one treatment over another (76·8 per cent). Seven recruitment issues were rated moderate or serious problems by a majority of respondents, the most problematic being a lack of eligible patients (60·3 per cent). The three most common retention issues were: participants forgetting to return questionnaires (81·4 per cent); participants found to be ineligible for the trial (74·3 per cent); and long follow-up period (70·7 per cent). The most problematic retention issues, rated moderate or serious by the majority of respondents, were participants forgetting to return questionnaires (56·4 per cent) and insufficient research nurse time/funding (53·6 per cent).

Conclusion: The survey identified a variety of common recruitment and retention issues, several of which were rated moderate or serious problems by the majority of participating UK surgical trial staff. Mitigation of these problems may help boost recruitment and retention in surgical trials.

Citing Articles

The development and acceptability of an educational and training intervention for recruiters to neonatal trials: the TRAIN project.

Smith V, Delaney H, Hunter A, Torgerson D, Treweek S, Gamble C BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; 23(1):265.

PMID: 37951890 PMC: 10638723. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02086-1.


Recruitment and retention interventions in surgical and wound care trials: A systematic review.

Arundel C, Mott A PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288028.

PMID: 37471398 PMC: 10358880. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288028.


Recruiting to surgical trials in the emergency setting: using a mixed methods study to understand clinician and patient perspectives.

Twiddy M, Birtwistle J, Edmondson A, Croft J, Gordon K, Meads D BJS Open. 2022; 6(6).

PMID: 36417312 PMC: 9683391. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac137.


Comment on: Recruitment and retention of participants in UK surgical trials: survey of key issues reported by trial staff.

Minty I BJS Open. 2021; 5(5).

PMID: 34718421 PMC: 8557755. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab110.


Embedding qualitative research in randomised controlled trials to improve recruitment: findings from two recruitment optimisation studies of orthopaedic surgical trials.

Scantlebury A, McDaid C, Brealey S, Cook E, Sharma H, Ranganathan A Trials. 2021; 22(1):461.

PMID: 34274006 PMC: 8285860. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05420-4.

References
1.
Elliott D, Hamdy F, Leslie T, Rosario D, Dudderidge T, Hindley R . Overcoming difficulties with equipoise to enable recruitment to a randomised controlled trial of partial ablation vs radical prostatectomy for unilateral localised prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2018; 122(6):970-977. PMC: 6348419. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14432. View

2.
Chapman S, Shelton B, Mahmood H, Fitzgerald J, Harrison E, Bhangu A . Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study. BMJ. 2014; 349:g6870. PMC: 4260649. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g6870. View

3.
Kaur G, Hutchison I, Mehanna H, Williamson P, Shaw R, Tudur Smith C . Barriers to recruitment for surgical trials in head and neck oncology: a survey of trial investigators. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(4). PMC: 3641444. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002625. View

4.
Mills N, Gaunt D, Blazeby J, Elliott D, Husbands S, Holding P . Training health professionals to recruit into challenging randomized controlled trials improved confidence: the development of the QuinteT randomized controlled trial recruitment training intervention. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 95:34-44. PMC: 5844671. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.015. View

5.
Kearney A, Daykin A, Shaw A, Lane A, Blazeby J, Clarke M . Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials. Trials. 2017; 18(1):406. PMC: 5580283. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2132-z. View