» Articles » PMID: 33015667

Orchiectomy in Transgender Individuals: A Motivation Analysis and Report of Surgical Outcomes

Overview
Date 2020 Oct 5
PMID 33015667
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Different surgical procedures are available for transgender women wishing to undergo genital gender-affirming surgery. To assess preoperative motivations, the frequency of orchiectomy procedures, and postoperative outcomes of orchiectomy in transgender individuals. All transgender individuals who underwent orchiectomy in the period between January 2012 and January 2020 at our institution were retrospectively identified. A chart study was conducted, recording motivations, demographics, perioperative characteristics and surgical outcomes. The frequency of orchiectomy and vaginoplasty procedures during the study period were determined and compared. During the study period, an increase of performed orchiectomy procedures was observed. The orchiectomy/vaginoplasty ratio was 0.01-0.07 in the period 2012-2018 and 0.24 in 2019. A total of 43 transgender individuals were retrospectively identified. Sixteen (37%) initially wished to undergo a vaginoplasty, but did not meet institutional requirements (nonsmoker, BMI < 30kg/m) or were not eligible for vaginoplasty surgery because of interfering somatic or mental health issues. Fourteen (33%) individuals who underwent orchiectomy regarded it as a preceding step to a future vaginoplasty procedure. Out of these fourteen, one person is now on the waiting list for vaginoplasty surgery. Thirteen (30%) others did not report a desire to pursue vaginoplasty in the future. This was mostly motivated by the absence of genital dysphoria or motivations related to their gender identity, with a desire to discontinue anti-testosterone treatment. The postoperative course was uncomplicated in 39 (91%) individuals. In the Netherlands, especially in the last year, the frequency of orchiectomy procedures has increased. Reasons that people chose to undergo this procedure include: not being eligible for a vaginoplasty procedure, seeing it as a preceding step to a possible future vaginoplasty or other identity-related motivations (i.e., non-binary gender identification or absence of genital dysphoria).

Citing Articles

Endocrine, gender dysphoria, and sexual function benefits of gender-affirming bilateral orchiectomy: patient outcomes and surgical technique.

Stelmar J, Victor R, Yuan N, Smith S, Mallavarapu S, Sandhu S Sex Med. 2024; 12(4):qfae048.

PMID: 39211910 PMC: 11359165. DOI: 10.1093/sexmed/qfae048.


Diagnosis and Medical Care of Male Individuals Who Seek Ablation of Their Genitalia without a Desire for Feminization.

Wibowo E, Bertin E, Johnson T, Kavanagh A, Wassersug R Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 52(3):859-864.

PMID: 36995536 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02586-7.


Prevalence and Factors Associated With Gender-Affirming Surgery Among Transgender Women & Transgender Men in a Community-Based Clinic in Metro Manila, Philippines: A Retrospective Study.

Eustaquio P, Castelo A, Arana Y, Corciega J, Rosadino J, Pagtakhan R Sex Med. 2022; 10(2):100497.

PMID: 35247792 PMC: 9023245. DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2022.100497.


Initial clinical experience with simple orchiectomy procedures in the context of transition-related surgeries.

Hana T, Raveendran L, Grober E, Potter E, Blodgett N, Krakowsky Y Int J Transgend Health. 2022; 21(4):403-409.

PMID: 34993518 PMC: 8726671. DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1774030.


Surgical and demographic trends in genital gender-affirming surgery in transgender women: 40 years of experience in Amsterdam.

van der Sluis W, de Nie I, Steensma T, van Mello N, Lissenberg-Witte B, Bouman M Br J Surg. 2021; 109(1):8-11.

PMID: 34291277 PMC: 10364763. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab213.

References
1.
Arcelus J, Bouman W, Noortgate W, Claes L, Witcomb G, Fernandez-Aranda F . Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies in transsexualism. Eur Psychiatry. 2015; 30(6):807-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.04.005. View

2.
Buncamper M, van der Sluis W, van der Pas R, Ozer M, Smit J, Witte B . Surgical Outcome after Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: A Retrospective Study of 475 Transgender Women. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138(5):999-1007. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002684. View

3.
Matoso A, Khandakar B, Yuan S, Wu T, Wang L, Lombardo K . Spectrum of findings in orchiectomy specimens of persons undergoing gender confirmation surgery. Hum Pathol. 2018; 76:91-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.03.007. View

4.
Buncamper M, Honselaar J, Bouman M, Ozer M, Kreukels B, Mullender M . Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of Neovaginoplasty Using Penile Skin in Male-to-Female Transsexuals. J Sex Med. 2015; 12(7):1626-34. DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12914. View

5.
Ives G, Fein L, Finch L, Sluiter E, Lane M, Kuzon W . Evaluation of BMI as a Risk Factor for Complications following Gender-affirming Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7(3):e2097. PMC: 6467628. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002097. View