» Articles » PMID: 33015666

Experiences of Surgery Readiness Assessments in British Columbia

Overview
Date 2020 Oct 5
PMID 33015666
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A surgical readiness assessment is a major step in the medical journey of trans people seeking gender-affirming surgery. Much of the peer-reviewed literature surrounding surgical readiness assessments emphasizes the perspectives of academics and clinicians, leaving the voices of trans and gender diverse patients largely unheard. This paper foregrounds patient experiences with surgery readiness assessments to discuss the tensions, challenges and opportunities they generate. We conducted a thematic analysis of 35 in-depth interviews with trans people who accessed or were seeking to access gender-affirming surgery in British Columbia. We developed three main themes to capture participants' narratives of their surgical assessment experiences. The first, assessments as gatekeeping, explores the stories of people who described their assessments as outdated and even discriminatory processes. The second, assessments as a barrier to care, discusses the informational missteps, bureaucratic regulations, economic issues, and geographic concerns that made assessments difficult to access. The third, assessments as useful, includes positive stories about assessments that often involved feeling supported by an assessor and feeling prepared for the next steps. These narratives demonstrate how much variation exists among people's experiences of readiness assessments for gender-affirming surgery. No matter how their actual assessment turned out, many participants approached their appointments with a great deal of anxiety and trepidation. We attributed this stress was to challenges ranging from lengthy wait times, arbitrary medical gatekeeping, a lack of access to knowledgeable and supportive providers, unclear or changing administrative processes, and insufficient communication. To address these challenges, it is crucial for the medical system to create more accessible pathways with centralized, up-to-date information for people trying to access assessments. Patients are best served by multi-disciplinary gender-affirming teams that provide individualized care.

Citing Articles

The lived experiences of transgender and gender-diverse people in accessing publicly funded penile-inversion vaginoplasty in Canada.

Lorello G, Tewari A, Sivagurunathan M, Potter E, Krakowsky Y, Du Mont J CMAJ. 2024; 196(24):E816-E825.

PMID: 38955411 PMC: 11230671. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.231250.


Exploring the gender care experiences and perspectives of individuals who discontinued their transition or detransitioned in Canada.

MacKinnon K, Gould W, Enxuga G, Kia H, Abramovich A, Lam J PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0293868.

PMID: 38019738 PMC: 10686467. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293868.


"What if I'm not trans enough? What if I'm not man enough?": Transgender young adults' experiences of gender-affirming healthcare readiness assessments in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Fraser G, Brady A, Wilson M Int J Transgend Health. 2023; 22(4):454-467.

PMID: 37808530 PMC: 10553372. DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2021.1933669.


Voices from a Multidisciplinary Healthcare Center: Understanding Barriers in Gender-Affirming Care-A Qualitative Exploration.

Ross M, Jahouh H, Mullender M, Kreukels B, van de Grift T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(14).

PMID: 37510602 PMC: 10379025. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20146367.


Factors Associated with Experiences of Gender-Affirming Health Care: A Systematic Review.

Howell J, Maguire R Transgend Health. 2023; 8(1):22-44.

PMID: 36895311 PMC: 9991448. DOI: 10.1089/trgh.2021.0033.


References
1.
Alcon A, Kennedy A, Wang E, Piper M, Loeliger K, Admassu N . Quantifying the Psychosocial Benefits of Masculinizing Mastectomy in Trans Male Patients with Patient-Reported Outcomes: The University of California, San Francisco, Gender Quality of Life Survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 147(5):731e-740e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007883. View

2.
Hale C . Ethical problems with the mental health evaluation standards of care for adult gender variant prospective patients. Perspect Biol Med. 2007; 50(4):491-505. DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2007.0047. View

3.
Dickey L, Singh A . Social Justice and Advocacy for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Clients. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2017; 40(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2016.10.009. View

4.
Meyer I . Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129(5):674-697. PMC: 2072932. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674. View

5.
Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C . Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ. 2001; 322(7284):468-72. PMC: 26564. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.468. View