» Articles » PMID: 33015079

Evaluation of Quadruple Real-Time PCR Method to Detect Enterococci Carrying Vancomycin-Resistant Genes in Rectal Swabs

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Oct 5
PMID 33015079
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To evaluate the sensitivity and accuracy of the quadruple real-time PCR method for the detection of enterococci carrying vancomycin-resistant genes , and in rectal swabs. Choosing PCR-sequenced DNA extracted directly from rectal swabs as the gold standard, the results of the quadruple real-time PCR method and the traditional method (screening culture combined PCR-sequencing method whose DNA extracted from single colony) were compared with the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the quadruple real-time PCR method and the traditional method were obtained. The time required for the three methods was calculated. The results between gold standard and the quadruple real-time PCR method were similar. Compared to the traditional method, the quadruple real-time PCR method had a much higher sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and consistency. Our study found that the quadruple real-time PCR method is beneficial for detection of enterococci carrying with vancomycin heteroresistance. The traditional method had high specificity and NPV, but its sensitivity and PPV were not ideal. The time needed for gold standard is a minimum of 28 h; the quadruple real-time PCR method takes 2-3 h while the traditional method consumes a minimum of 72 h. The quadruple real-time PCR method can provide a rapid and reliable result for the diagnosis of patients with colonized vancomycin-resistant enterococci. This new method is beneficial for the active screening, timely clinical treatment measures, epidemiological research, and hospital monitoring of the enterococci carrying vancomycin-resistant gene, especially for the enterococci with vancomycin heteroresistance carrying .

Citing Articles

Polymicrobial Anaerobic Meningitis Detected by Next-Generation Sequencing: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Li X, Du H, Song Z, Wang H, Long X Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:840910.

PMID: 35273982 PMC: 8902384. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.840910.


and Affect Various Stages of Species Biofilm Formation.

He Y, Na R, Niu X, Xiao B, Yang H Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021; 11:568178.

PMID: 33680986 PMC: 7933028. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.568178.

References
1.
Bae M, Kim J, Sung H, Jeong Y, Kim M . Evaluation of iNtRON VRE vanA/vanB real-time PCR for follow-up surveillance of VRE-infected or colonized patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013; 77(4):292-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.08.006. View

2.
Humphreys H . Controlling the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Is active screening worthwhile?. J Hosp Infect. 2014; 88(4):191-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.09.002. View

3.
Cheng V, Chen J, Tai J, Wong S, Poon R, Hung I . Decolonization of gastrointestinal carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: case series and review of literature. BMC Infect Dis. 2014; 14:514. PMC: 4180964. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-514. View

4.
Babady N, Gilhuley K, Cianciminio-Bordelon D, Tang Y . Performance characteristics of the Cepheid Xpert vanA assay for rapid identification of patients at high risk for carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50(11):3659-63. PMC: 3486258. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01776-12. View

5.
Chen C, Sun J, Guo Y, Lin D, Guo Q, Hu F . High Prevalence of vanM in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Isolates from Shanghai, China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 59(12):7795-8. PMC: 4649207. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01732-15. View