» Articles » PMID: 33014352

Biomechanical Effect of Tibial Slope on the Stability of Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Posterior Cruciate Ligament-deficient Knees

Overview
Journal Bone Joint Res
Date 2020 Oct 5
PMID 33014352
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has become a popular method of treating knee localized osteoarthritis (OA). Additionally, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is essential to maintaining the physiological kinematics and functions of the knee joint. Considering these factors, the purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects on PCL-deficient knees in medial UKA.

Methods: Computational simulations of five subject-specific models were performed for intact and PCL-deficient UKA with tibial slopes. Anteroposterior (AP) kinematics and contact stresses of the patellofemoral (PF) joint and the articular cartilage were evaluated under the deep-knee-bend condition.

Results: As compared to intact UKA, there was no significant difference in AP translation in PCL-deficient UKA with a low flexion angle, but AP translation significantly increased in the PCL-deficient UKA with high flexion angles. Additionally, the increased AP translation became decreased as the posterior tibial slope increased. The contact stress in the PF joint and the articular cartilage significantly increased in the PCL-deficient UKA, as compared to the intact UKA. Additionally, the increased posterior tibial slope resulted in a significant decrease in the contact stress on PF joint but significantly increased the contact stresses on the articular cartilage.

Conclusion: Our results showed that the posterior stability for low flexion activities in PCL-deficient UKA remained unaffected; however, the posterior stability for high flexion activities was affected. This indicates that a functional PCL is required to ensure normal stability in UKA. Additionally, posterior stability and PF joint may reduce the overall risk of progressive OA by increasing the posterior tibial slope. However, the excessive posterior tibial slope must be avoided.Cite this article: 2020;9(9):593-600.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and accuracy of robot-assisted tunnel placement in anatomic arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Yang G, Huang H, Shao J, Liu D, Liu K, Zhang Z Int J Surg. 2024; 111(1):1479-1483.

PMID: 38990328 PMC: 11745619. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001936.


Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty combined with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report.

Zheng T, Du L, Chu Z, Li L, Li B, Zhang B BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):370.

PMID: 38730370 PMC: 11088125. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07492-0.


Anterior cruciate ligament injury should not be considered a contraindication for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Finite element analysis.

Ou D, Ye Y, Pan J, Huang Y, Kuang H, Tang S PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0299649.

PMID: 38470904 PMC: 10931476. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299649.


Robotic arm-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty resulted in superior radiological accuracy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Yeung M, Fu H, Cheung A, Kwan V, Cheung M, Chan P Arthroplasty. 2023; 5(1):55.

PMID: 37915082 PMC: 10621242. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00210-6.


[Risk factors for contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injury after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Wang Y, Yu Z, Li J, Li Q Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023; 37(5):578-583.

PMID: 37190835 PMC: 10196966. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202301045.


References
1.
Giffin J, Stabile K, Zantop T, Vogrin T, Woo S, Harner C . Importance of tibial slope for stability of the posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(9):1443-9. DOI: 10.1177/0363546507304665. View

2.
Clancy Jr W, Shelbourne K, Zoellner G, Keene J, Reider B, Rosenberg T . Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Report of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65(3):310-22. View

3.
Roussot M, Haddad F . The evolution and role of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: The road less travelled, but not forgotten. Bone Joint Res. 2019; 7(12):636-638. PMC: 6318750. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.712.BJR-2018-0303. View

4.
Godest A, Beaugonin M, Haug E, Taylor M, Gregson P . Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. J Biomech. 2002; 35(2):267-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00179-8. View

5.
Kwon H, Yang I, Lee W, Yu A, Oh S, Park K . Reliability of Intraoperative Knee Range of Motion Measurements by Goniometer Compared with Robot-Assisted Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2018; 32(3):233-238. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641140. View