Girls in STEM: Is It a Female Role-Model Thing?

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2020 Oct 5

PMID 33013573

Citations 12

Authors

Susana Gonzalez-Perez

Ruth Mateos de Cabo

Milagros Sainz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Women are underrepresented in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) careers, and this poses new challenges at the dawn of the era of digital transformation. The goal of the present study is to demonstrate how female role models influence girls' preferences for STEM studies. This paper evaluates a role-model intervention in which female volunteers working in STEM go into schools to talk to girls about their careers. The study was conducted with 304 girls, from 12 years old (sixth primary grade) to 16 years old (fourth secondary grade), both before and after the role-model sessions. An adaptation of the expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation is used to test the extent to which this role-model intervention improves girls' beliefs that they can be successful in STEM fields and increases their likelihood of choosing a STEM career. The results of multigroup structural equation modeling analysis show that on average, the role-model intervention has a positive and significant effect on mathematics enjoyment, importance attached to math, expectations of success in math, and girls' aspirations in STEM, and a negative effect on gender stereotypes. Additionally, the female role-model sessions significantly increase the positive impact of expectations of success on STEM choices. Finally, the moderation role of the counterstereotypical content of the role-model sessions is tested. The results show that the higher the counterstereotypical character of the sessions, the higher the relationship between expectations of success in math and the choice of STEM. These results are discussed regarding their implications for long-term STEM engagement.

Citing Articles

Decision-making factors: Exploring the influences on high school girls' decisions to choose science subjects in Cameroon: A qualitative case study.

Edeh E, Oyamb-Itomp M Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40879.

PMID: 39717602 PMC: 11664277. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40879.

Is medical school culture conducive to women's academic success? a survey on faculty perceptions and experiences of gender equity.

Shorey S, Gan Y, Cavert M, Archuleta S BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1462.

PMID: 39696357 PMC: 11653761. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06470-3.

Editorial: Women in environmental toxicology.

Langan L, Bloor M, Sevcik A, Bruce E Front Toxicol. 2024; 6:1490209.

PMID: 39563983 PMC: 11573783. DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1490209.

Female Models in AI and the Fight Against COVID-19.

Guerrero C, Mazuelas S F1000Res. 2024; 11:1037.

PMID: 39296496 PMC: 11409909. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.123599.1.

Reducing the gender gap on adolescents' interest in study fields: The impact of perceived changes in ingroup gender norms and gender prototypicality.

Iacoviello V, Valsecchi G, Vetois M, Falomir-Pichastor J Soc Psychol Educ. 2024; 27(3):1043-1063.

PMID: 39070575 PMC: 11271416. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09909-z.

References

Wang M, Degol J, Ye F . Math achievement is important, but task values are critical, too: examining the intellectual and motivational factors leading to gender disparities in STEM careers. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:36. PMC: 4330678. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00036. View

Knapp T . Why Is the One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design Still Used?. Clin Nurs Res. 2016; 25(5):467-72. DOI: 10.1177/1054773816666280. View

Olsson M, Martiny S . Does Exposure to Counterstereotypical Role Models Influence Girls' and Women's Gender Stereotypes and Career Choices? A Review of Social Psychological Research. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2264. PMC: 6292925. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02264. View

Skaggs S, Stainback K, Duncan P . Shaking things up or business as usual? The influence of female corporate executives and board of directors on women's managerial representation. Soc Sci Res. 2012; 41(4):936-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.01.006. View

Dimitrov D, Rumrill Jr P . Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work. 2003; 20(2):159-65. View

Walton G, Cohen G . A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007; 92(1):82-96. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82. View

Bussey K, Bandura A . Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychol Rev. 1999; 106(4):676-713. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.676. View

Diekman A, Brown E, Johnston A, Clark E . Seeking congruity between goals and roles: a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(8):1051-7. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610377342. View

Gaucher D, Friesen J, Kay A . Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011; 101(1):109-28. DOI: 10.1037/a0022530. View

10.

Marx D, Stapel D, Muller D . We can do it: the interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005; 88(3):432-46. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.432. View

11.

Williams W, Ceci S . When Scientists Choose Motherhood: A single factor goes a long way in explaining the dearth of women in math-intensive fields. How can we address it?. Am Sci. 2014; 100(2):138-145. PMC: 3939045. DOI: 10.1511/2012.95.138. View

12.

Good C, Rattan A, Dweck C . Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012; 102(4):700-17. DOI: 10.1037/a0026659. View

13.

Solbes-Canales I, Valverde-Montesino S, Herranz-Hernandez P . Socialization of Gender Stereotypes Related to Attributes and Professions Among Young Spanish School-Aged Children. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:609. PMC: 7194082. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00609. View

14.

Stoeger H, Schirner S, Laemmle L, Obergriesser S, Heilemann M, Ziegler A . A contextual perspective on talented female participants and their development in extracurricular STEM programs. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016; 1377(1):53-66. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13116. View

15.

Watt H, Shapka J, Morris Z, Durik A, Keating D, Eccles J . Gendered motivational processes affecting high school mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: a comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Dev Psychol. 2012; 48(6):1594-611. DOI: 10.1037/a0027838. View

16.

Sainz M, Martinez-Cantos J, Rodo-de-Zarate M, Romano M, Arroyo L, Fabregues S . Young Spanish People's Gendered Representations of People Working in STEM. A Qualitative Study. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:996. PMC: 6514192. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00996. View

17.

Wang M, Degol J . Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy-Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields. Dev Rev. 2013; 33(4). PMC: 3843492. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001. View

18.

Wigfield , Eccles . Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000; 25(1):68-81. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015. View

19.

Stout J, Dasgupta N, Hunsinger M, McManus M . STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 100(2):255-70. DOI: 10.1037/a0021385. View

20.

Cheryan S, Master A, Meltzoff A . Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls' interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:49. PMC: 4323745. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049. View