» Articles » PMID: 33013491

Continuous Blood Pressure Estimation From Electrocardiogram and Photoplethysmogram During Arrhythmias

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2020 Oct 5
PMID 33013491
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Continuous blood pressure (BP) provides valuable information for the disease management of patients with arrhythmias. The traditional intra-arterial method is too invasive for routine healthcare settings, whereas cuff-based devices are inferior in reliability and comfortable for long-term BP monitoring during arrhythmias. The study aimed to investigate an indirect method for continuous and cuff-less BP estimation based on electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals during arrhythmias and to test its reliability for the determination of BP using invasive BP (IBP) as reference.

Methods: Thirty-five clinically stable patients (15 with ventricular arrhythmias and 20 with supraventricular arrhythmias) who had undergone radiofrequency ablation were enrolled in this study. Their ECG, PPG, and femoral arterial IBP signals were simultaneously recorded with a multi-parameter monitoring system. Fifteen features that have the potential ability in indicating beat-to-beat BP changes during arrhythmias were extracted from the ECG and PPG signals. Four machine learning algorithms, decision tree regression (DTR), support vector machine regression (SVR), adaptive boosting regression (AdaboostR), and random forest regression (RFR), were then implemented to develop the BP models.

Results: The results showed that the mean value ± standard deviation of root mean square error for the estimated systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) with the RFR model against the reference in all patients were 5.87 ± 3.13 and 3.52 ± 1.38 mmHg, respectively, which achieved the best performance among all the models. Furthermore, the mean error ± standard deviation of error between the estimated SBP and DBP with the RFR model against the reference in all patients were -0.04 ± 6.11 and 0.11 ± 3.62 mmHg, respectively, which complied with the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the British Hypertension Society (Grade A) standards.

Conclusion: The results indicated that the utilization of ECG and PPG signals has the potential to enable cuff-less and continuous BP estimation in an indirect way for patients with arrhythmias.

Citing Articles

Advancement in the Cuffless and Noninvasive Measurement of Blood Pressure: A Review of the Literature and Open Challenges.

Khan Mamun M, Sherif A Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(1).

PMID: 36671599 PMC: 9854981. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10010027.


Advances in Cuffless Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring Technology Based on PPG Signals.

Qin C, Wang X, Xu G, Ma X Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:8094351.

PMID: 36217389 PMC: 9547685. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8094351.


Diagnostic Features and Potential Applications of PPG Signal in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.

Almarshad M, Islam M, Al-Ahmadi S, BaHammam A Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(3).

PMID: 35327025 PMC: 8950880. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10030547.


Towards a portable-noninvasive blood pressure monitoring system utilizing the photoplethysmogram signal.

Dagamseh A, Qananwah Q, Al Quran H, Ibrahim K Biomed Opt Express. 2022; 12(12):7732-7751.

PMID: 35003863 PMC: 8713675. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.444535.


Evaluation of the Accuracy of Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement Devices: Challenges and Proposals.

Mukkamala R, Yavarimanesh M, Natarajan K, Hahn J, Kyriakoulis K, Avolio A Hypertension. 2021; 78(5):1161-1167.

PMID: 34510915 PMC: 8516718. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17747.


References
1.
Liu Z, Liu J, Wen B, He Q, Li Y, Miao F . Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation Using Pressure Pulse Wave Signals. Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(12). PMC: 6308537. DOI: 10.3390/s18124227. View

2.
Chen Y, Shi S, Liu Y, Huang S, Ma T . Cuffless blood-pressure estimation method using a heart-rate variability-derived parameter. Physiol Meas. 2018; 39(9):095002. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aad902. View

3.
Khurshid S, Choi S, Weng L, Wang E, Trinquart L, Benjamin E . Frequency of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities in a Half Million Adults. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018; 11(7):e006273. PMC: 6051725. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006273. View

4.
Weinman J, Sapoznikov D, Eliakim M . Arterial pulse wave velocity and left ventricular tension period in cardiac arrhythmias. Cardiovasc Res. 1971; 5(4):513-23. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/5.4.513. View

5.
Liu J, Yan B, Zhang Y, Ding X, Su P, Zhao N . Multi-Wavelength Photoplethysmography Enabling Continuous Blood Pressure Measurement With Compact Wearable Electronics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018; 66(6):1514-1525. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2874957. View