» Articles » PMID: 33008422

OPTimizing Irradiation Through Molecular Assessment of Lymph Node (OPTIMAL): a Randomized Open Label Trial

Abstract

Background: Conservative surgery followed by breast and nodal irradiation is the standard loco-regional early breast cancer (BC) treatment for patients with four or more involved lymph nodes. However, the treatment strategy when fewer nodes are involved remains unclear, especially when lymphadenectomy has not been performed. Sensitive nodal status assessment molecular techniques as the One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) assay can contribute to the definition and standardization of the treatment strategy. Therefore, the OPTIMAL study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of incidental irradiation of axillary nodes in patients with early-stage BC and limited involvement of the SLN.

Methods: BC patients who underwent conservative surgery and whose SLN total tumour load assessed with OSNA ranged between 250-15,000 copies/µL will be eligible. Patients will be randomized to receive irradiation on the breast, tumour bed, axillary and supraclavicular lymph node areas (intentional arm) or only on the breast and tumour bed (incidental arm). All areas, including the internal mammary chain, will be contoured. The mean, median, D5% and D95% doses received in all volumes will be calculated. The primary endpoint is the non-inferiority of the incidental irradiation of axillary nodes compared to the intentional irradiation in terms of 5-year disease free survival. Secondary endpoints comprise the comparison of acute and chronic toxicity and loco-regional and distant disease recurrence rates.

Discussion: Standardizing the treatment and diagnosis of BC patients with few nodes affected is crucial due to the lack of consensus. Hence, the quantitative score for the metastatic burden of SLN provided by OSNA can contribute by improving the discrimination of which BC patients with limited nodal involvement can benefit from incidental radiation as an adjuvant treatment strategy.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02335957; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02335957.

Citing Articles

Escalation and De-Escalation of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: Strategies for Risk-Adapted Optimization.

Gruber G Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272804 PMC: 11394564. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172946.


Survival and recurrence with or without axillary dissection in patients with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis.

Monteiro Sanvido V, Elias S, Facina G, Bromberg S, Nazario A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):19893.

PMID: 34615952 PMC: 8494764. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99359-w.

References
1.
Bayo E, Herruzo I, Arenas M, Algara M . Consensus on the regional lymph nodes irradiation in breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2013; 15(10):766-73. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-013-1027-z. View

2.
Recht A, Comen E, Fine R, Fleming G, Hardenbergh P, Ho A . Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: An American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology Focused Guideline Update. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016; 6(6):e219-e234. DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.08.009. View

3.
van Wely B, Teerenstra S, Schinagl D, Aufenacker T, de Wilt J, Strobbe L . Systematic review of the effect of external beam radiation therapy to the breast on axillary recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. Br J Surg. 2011; 98(3):326-33. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7360. View

4.
Savolt A, Peley G, Polgar C, Udvarhelyi N, Rubovszky G, Kovacs E . Eight-year follow up result of the OTOASOR trial: The Optimal Treatment Of the Axilla - Surgery Or Radiotherapy after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: A randomized, single centre, phase III, non-inferiority trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43(4):672-679. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.011. View

5.
Gentilini O, Veronesi U . Abandoning sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer? A new trial in progress at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (SOUND: Sentinel node vs Observation after axillary UltraSouND). Breast. 2012; 21(5):678-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.06.013. View