» Articles » PMID: 33007078

Reduced Fixation Stability Induced by Peripheral Viewing Does Not Contribute to Crowding

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2020 Oct 2
PMID 33007078
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Attending to peripheral visual targets while maintaining central fixation, a process that involves covert attention, reduces fixation stability. Here, we tested the hypothesis that changes in fixation stability induced by peripheral viewing contribute to crowding in peripheral vision by increasing positional uncertainty. We first assessed whether fixation was less stable during peripheral versus central (foveal) viewing for both crowded and uncrowded stimuli. We then tested whether fixation stability during peripheral viewing was associated with the extent of crowding. Fourteen participants performed a tumbling E orientation discrimination task at three different eccentricities (0°, 5°, 10°). The target was presented with or without flankers. Fixational eye movements were measured using an infrared video-based eyetracker. A central fixation cross was provided for the two peripheral viewing conditions, and optotype size was scaled for each eccentricity. Discrimination of appropriately scaled uncrowded stimuli was unaffected by eccentricity, whereas discrimination of crowded stimuli deteriorated dramatically with eccentricity, despite scaling. Both crowded and uncrowded peripheral stimuli were associated with reduced fixation stability, increased microsaccadic amplitude, and a greater proportion of horizontal microsaccades relative to centrally presented stimuli. However, these effects were not associated with the magnitude of crowding. This suggests that reduced fixation stability due to peripheral viewing does not contribute to crowding in peripheral vision.

Citing Articles

Do microsaccades vary with discriminability around the visual field?.

Purokayastha S, Roberts M, Carrasco M J Vis. 2024; 24(6):11.

PMID: 38869372 PMC: 11178122. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.6.11.


Training-induced changes in population receptive field properties in visual cortex: Impact of eccentric vision training on population receptive field properties and the crowding effect.

Malania M, Lin Y, Hormandinger C, Werner J, Greenlee M, Plank T J Vis. 2024; 24(5):7.

PMID: 38771584 PMC: 11114612. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.5.7.


Do microsaccades vary with discriminability around the visual field?.

Purokayastha S, Roberts M, Carrasco M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38260406 PMC: 10802594. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.11.575288.


Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.

Gonzalez-Vides L, Hernandez-Verdejo J, Canadas-Suarez P J Eye Mov Res. 2023; 16(3).

PMID: 38111688 PMC: 10725735. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.16.3.3.


Altered Eye Movements During Reading With Simulated Central and Peripheral Visual Field Defects.

Yu H, Kwon M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(13):21.

PMID: 37843494 PMC: 10584020. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.13.21.


References
1.
Sansbury R, Skavenski A, Haddad G, Steinman R . Normal fixation of eccentric targets. J Opt Soc Am. 1973; 63(5):612-4. DOI: 10.1364/josa.63.000612. View

2.
Bricolo E, Salvi C, Martelli M, Arduino L, Daini R . The effects of crowding on eye movement patterns in reading. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015; 160:23-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.06.003. View

3.
Costela F, Otero-Millan J, McCamy M, Macknik S, Di Stasi L, Rieiro H . Characteristics of Spontaneous Square-Wave Jerks in the Healthy Macaque Monkey during Visual Fixation. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0126485. PMC: 4466238. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126485. View

4.
Martinez-Conde S, Macknik S, Troncoso X, Hubel D . Microsaccades: a neurophysiological analysis. Trends Neurosci. 2009; 32(9):463-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.006. View

5.
Cherici C, Kuang X, Poletti M, Rucci M . Precision of sustained fixation in trained and untrained observers. J Vis. 2012; 12(6). PMC: 3489479. DOI: 10.1167/12.6.31. View