» Articles » PMID: 33001664

Age Differences in Item Selection Behaviors and Subsequent Memory for New Foreign Language Vocabulary: Evidence for a Region of Proximal Learning Heuristic

Overview
Journal Psychol Aging
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2020 Oct 1
PMID 33001664
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We examined younger and older adults' item selection behaviors to assess heuristics for self-regulating learning of English meanings of Chinese characters varying widely in figural complexity. Two study-test trials were used to assess whether (a) item selection behaviors on the first study opportunity would show evidence for a difficulty-based heuristic as posited by Metcalfe's (2002) region of proximal learning (RPL) theory, or alternatively, influences of habitual English-language reading order (i.e. left-to-right, top-to-bottom); (b) whether second-trial selection behaviors were better predicted by RPL or by the discrepancy reduction model (DRM; Dunlosky & Hertzog, 1998); and (c) whether Trial 1 test performance would alter Trial 2 study in a manner predicted by RPL. DRM stipulates people select any item for study at Trial 2 that was not previously recalled. RPL states that people study only items they believe they can learn, avoiding complex items above their subjective RPL. Stimuli were 36 Chinese-English vocabulary pairs randomly presented in six 2 × 3-element grids. Both habitual reading order and stimulus complexity at Trial 1 affected order of study, with participants of both age groups manifesting a preference to study less complex characters. However, older adults showed larger effects of stimulus complexity whereas younger adults had larger effects of habitual reading order. At Trial 2, older adults showed a greater tendency to avoid studying the most complex Chinese characters, consistent with RPL, which contributed to their lower rates of vocabulary acquisition. Older adults' more conservative RPLs appeared to constrain their degree of self-regulated learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Bounded Rationality in Study Time Allocation: Evidence Based on Risky Choice Framing Effects.

Xu H, Gao Y, Xiao Q, Li N, Chu Y, Li X Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39594391 PMC: 11590912. DOI: 10.3390/bs14111091.


Enhancing Foreign Language Learning Approaches to Promote Healthy Aging: A Systematic Review.

Klimova B, de Paula Nascimento E Silva C J Psycholinguist Res. 2024; 53(4):48.

PMID: 38758475 PMC: 11101570. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-024-10088-3.

References
1.
Froger C, Bouazzaoui B, Isingrini M, Taconnat L . Study time allocation deficit of older adults: the role of environmental support at encoding?. Psychol Aging. 2011; 27(3):577-88. DOI: 10.1037/a0026358. View

2.
Finn B, Metcalfe J . Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Memory for Past Test. J Mem Lang. 2008; 58(1):19-34. PMC: 2836879. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.006. View

3.
West R, Dark-Freudeman A, Bagwell D . Goals-feedback conditions and episodic memory: Mechanisms for memory gains in older and younger adults. Memory. 2008; 17(2):233-44. DOI: 10.1080/09658210802236407. View

4.
Murayama K, Sakaki M, Yan V, Smith G . Type I error inflation in the traditional by-participant analysis to metamemory accuracy: a generalized mixed-effects model perspective. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014; 40(5):1287-306. DOI: 10.1037/a0036914. View

5.
Price J, Murray R . The region of proximal learning heuristic and adult age differences in self-regulated learning. Psychol Aging. 2012; 27(4):1120-1129. DOI: 10.1037/a0029860. View