» Articles » PMID: 32998434

Regulation of Sulfate Uptake and Assimilation in Barley () As Affected by Rhizospheric and Atmospheric Sulfur Nutrition

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2020 Oct 1
PMID 32998434
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To study the regulation of sulfate metabolism in barley (), seedlings were exposed to atmospheric hydrogen sulfide (HS) in the presence and absence of a sulfate supply. Sulfate deprivation reduced shoot and root biomass production by 60% and 70%, respectively, and it affected the plant's mineral nutrient composition. It resulted in a 5.7- and 2.9-fold increased shoot and root molybdenum content, respectively, and a decreased content of several other mineral nutrients. Particularly, it decreased shoot and root total sulfur contents by 60% and 70%, respectively. These decreases could be ascribed to decreased sulfate contents. Sulfate deficiency was additionally characterized by significantly lowered cysteine, glutathione and soluble protein levels, enhanced dry matter, nitrate and free amino acid contents, an increased APS reductase (APR) activity and an increased expression and activity of the root sulfate uptake transporters. When sulfate-deprived barley was exposed to 0.6 µL L atmospheric HS, the decrease in biomass production and the development of other sulfur deficiency symptoms were alleviated. Clearly, barley could use HS, absorbed by the foliage, as a sulfur source for growth. HS fumigation of both sulfate-deprived and sulfate-sufficient plants downregulated APR activity as well as the expression and activity of the sulfate uptake transporters. Evidently, barley switched from rhizospheric sulfate to atmospheric HS as sulfur source. Though this indicates that sulfate utilization in barley is controlled by signals originating in the shoot, the signal transduction pathway involved in the shoot-to-root regulation must be further elucidated.

Citing Articles

Impact of Sulfur Deficiency and Excess on the Growth and Development of Soybean Seedlings.

Zhou J, Zhang H, Huang Y, Jiao S, Zheng X, Lu W Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39457037 PMC: 11508489. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011253.


Foliar Application of Sulfur-Containing Compounds-Pros and Cons.

Bouranis D, Chorianopoulou S Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(22).

PMID: 38005690 PMC: 10674314. DOI: 10.3390/plants12223794.


The Transcriptome and Metabolome Reveal Stress Responses in Sulfur-Fumigated Cucumber ( L.).

Liu J, Gao Y, Gong F, Hou F, Zhang Z, Cheng X Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:778956.

PMID: 34868181 PMC: 8636124. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.778956.

References
1.
Reich M, Shahbaz M, Prajapati D, Parmar S, Hawkesford M, De Kok L . Interactions of Sulfate with Other Nutrients As Revealed by H2S Fumigation of Chinese Cabbage. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:541. PMC: 4847332. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00541. View

2.
Reid R, Gridley K, Kawamata Y, Zhu Y . Arsenite elicits anomalous sulfur starvation responses in barley. Plant Physiol. 2013; 162(1):401-9. PMC: 3641219. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.216937. View

3.
Hawkesford M, De Kok L . Managing sulphur metabolism in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2006; 29(3):382-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01470.x. View

4.
Buchner P, Stuiver C, Westerman S, Wirtz M, Hell R, Hawkesford M . Regulation of sulfate uptake and expression of sulfate transporter genes in Brassica oleracea as affected by atmospheric H(2)S and pedospheric sulfate nutrition. Plant Physiol. 2004; 136(2):3396-408. PMC: 523398. DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.046441. View

5.
Almario J, Jeena G, Wunder J, Langen G, Zuccaro A, Coupland G . Root-associated fungal microbiota of nonmycorrhizal and its contribution to plant phosphorus nutrition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(44):E9403-E9412. PMC: 5676915. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710455114. View