» Articles » PMID: 32998260

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Less Than 92 Is a Predictor for Late Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Oct 1
PMID 32998260
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is the most lethal complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The main risk factor for PPH is the development of a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Recent evidence shows that the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) may be predictive indicator for POPF. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether GNRI is a reliable predictive marker for PPH following PD. The present study retrospectively evaluated 121 patients treated with PD at Ageo Central General Hospital in Japan between January 2015 and March 2020. We investigated the potential of age, gender, body mass index, serum albumin, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA), diabetes mellitus and smoking status, time taken for the operation, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications (POPF, bile leak, and surgical site infections) to predict the risk of PPH following PD using univariate and multivariate analyses. Ten patients had developed PPH with an incidence of 8.3%. Among them, the patients were divided into bleeding group ( = 10) and non-bleeding group ( = 111). The bleeding group had significantly lower GNRI values than those in the non-bleeding group ( = 0.001). We determined that the cut-off value of GNRI was 92 accounting for a sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 82.9%, and likelihood ratio of 4.6 using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A GNRI of <92 was statistically associated with PPH in both univariate ( < 0.001) and multivariate analysis ( = 0.01). Therefore, we could identify that a GNRI < 92 was an independently potential predictor of PPH risk following PD. We should alert surgeons if patients have low level GNRI before PD.

Citing Articles

Preoperative geriatric nutritional risk index predicts prognosis and postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Zhao W, Liu L, Zhang J, Shi L, Zhang C, Ma Y BMC Geriatr. 2025; 25(1):101.

PMID: 39955512 PMC: 11829379. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05667-x.


Recurrent cholangitis due to an intrahepatic calculus caused by migrated coil for vascular embolization: A case report.

Funamizu N, Sogabe K, Uraoka M, Numata Y, Koizumi M, Ito C Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(51):e41038.

PMID: 39705414 PMC: 11666128. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041038.


C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio as a Predictive Indicator for Evaluating Tolerability in S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Curative Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer: An External Validation Cohort Study.

Funamizu N, Mori S, Sakamoto A, Iwata M, Shine M, Ito C Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39409992 PMC: 11475895. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193372.


The impact of preoperative nutritional status on postoperative outcomes: an insight from Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in elderly pancreaticoduodenectomy patients.

Hou T, Lin Y, Liu Y, Liu Y, Li W, Kuo M BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):100.

PMID: 38580988 PMC: 10996270. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02397-0.


Development and validation of a nomogram based on geriatric nutritional risk index for predicting prognosis and postoperative complications in surgical patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Wu P, Liu J, Wang X, Lai S, Wang J, Wang J J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(20):18185-18200.

PMID: 38032382 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05462-y.


References
1.
Stampfl U, Hackert T, Sommer C, Klauss M, Bellemann N, Siebert S . Superselective embolization for the management of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: a single-center experience in 25 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012; 23(4):504-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.12.013. View

2.
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M . The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017; 161(3):584-591. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. View

3.
Asari S, Matsumoto I, Toyama H, Yamaguchi M, Okada T, Shinzeki M . Recommendation of treatment strategy for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: Lessons from a single-center experience in 35 patients. Pancreatology. 2016; 16(3):454-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.02.003. View

4.
DeOliveira M, Winter J, Schafer M, Cunningham S, Cameron J, Yeo C . Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006; 244(6):931-7. PMC: 1856636. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a. View

5.
Izumo W, Higuchi R, Yazawa T, Uemura S, Shiihara M, Yamamoto M . Evaluation of preoperative risk factors for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019; 404(8):967-974. PMC: 6935390. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01830-w. View