» Articles » PMID: 32994653

Covid-19 and Rural Landscape: The Case of Italy

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Sep 30
PMID 32994653
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Throughout the covid-19 emergency, health authorities have presented contagion data divided by administrative regions with no reference to the type of landscape, environment or development model. This study has been conducted to understand whether there is a correlation between the number of infections and the different rural landscapes of the country. Italy's rural landscape can be classified in four types, according to the intensity of energy inputs used in the agricultural process, socioeconomic and environmental features. Type A includes areas of periurban agriculture surrounding the metropolitan cities, type B areas of intensive agriculture with high concentration of agroindustry, type C hilly areas with highly diversified agriculture and valuable landscape, and type D high hills and mountains with forests and protected areas. Areas A and B are located in the plains, covering 21% of the territory and accounting for 57% of the population. They produce most of the added value, consume high levels of energy and represent the main source of pollution. Areas C and D cover 79% of the territory and 43% of the population. We find that provinces with 10% more type C and D areas exhibit on average 10% fewer cases of contagion. The result is statistically significant, after controlling for demographic, economic and environmental characteristics of the provinces. The pollution produced in more energy-intensive landscape has triggered an intense debate of how to ensure the economic competitiveness of Italian agriculture, without compromising environmental integrity or public health. Our findings speak to this debate, by suggesting that planning for more rural territory with lower energy inputs may come with the added benefit of new development opportunities and decreasing the exposure of the population to covid-19. Cost benefit-analyses should take into account that policies aimed at revitalizing more rural areas may reduce the economic impact of covid-19 and of potential future pandemics.

Citing Articles

Ecosystem degradation and the spread of Covid-19.

Castelli C, Castellini M, Comincioli N, Parisi M, Pontarollo N, Vergalli S Environ Monit Assess. 2023; 195(7):836.

PMID: 37308607 PMC: 10260383. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11403-6.


Geographic heterogeneity of the epidemiological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy using a socioeconomic proxy-based classification of the national territory.

Petrelli A, Ventura M, Di Napoli A, Mateo-Urdiales A, Pezzotti P, Fabiani M Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1143189.

PMID: 37151598 PMC: 10160611. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1143189.


Territorial differences in the spread of COVID-19 in European regions and US counties.

Natale F, Iacus S, Conte A, Spyratos S, Sermi F PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0280780.

PMID: 36753502 PMC: 9907802. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280780.


Social Factors as Major Determinants of Rural Development Variation for Predicting Epidemic Vulnerability: A Lesson for the Future.

Dudzinska M, Gwiazdzinska-Goraj M, Jezierska-Thole A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(21).

PMID: 36360858 PMC: 9656134. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192113977.


An Epidemiological Study to Investigate Links between Atmospheric Pollution from Farming and SARS-CoV-2 Mortality.

Contiero P, Borgini A, Bertoldi M, Abita A, Cuffari G, Tomao P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(8).

PMID: 35457503 PMC: 9029287. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084637.


References
1.
Kumar A, Padhee A, Kumar S . How Indian agriculture should change after COVID-19. Food Secur. 2020; 12(4):837-840. PMC: 7338143. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-020-01063-6. View

2.
Elleby C, Dominguez I, Adenauer M, Genovese G . Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Global Agricultural Markets. Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2020; 76(4):1067-1079. PMC: 7399617. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-020-00473-6. View

3.
Villulla J . COVID-19 in Argentine agriculture: global threats, local contradictions and possible responses. Agric Human Values. 2020; 37(3):595-596. PMC: 7220584. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-020-10096-8. View

4.
Anastassopoulou C, Russo L, Tsakris A, Siettos C . Data-based analysis, modelling and forecasting of the COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS One. 2020; 15(3):e0230405. PMC: 7108749. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230405. View

5.
Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, DAntonio C, Dobson A, Howarth R . Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science. 2001; 292(5515):281-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1057544. View