» Articles » PMID: 32993021

Applying Principles from Prevention and Implementation Sciences to Optimize the Dissemination of Family Feeding Interventions

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Sep 30
PMID 32993021
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because families are the primary food socialization agent for children, they are a key target for nutrition interventions promoting healthy eating development. Although researchers and clinicians have developed and tested successful family nutrition interventions, few have gained widespread dissemination. Prevention and implementation science disciplines can inform the design, testing, and dissemination of feeding interventions to advance the goals of widespread adoption and population health impact. We review concepts and frameworks from prevention science and dissemination and implementation (D&I) research that are useful to consider in designing, implementing, and evaluating feeding interventions. Risk and protective factor frameworks, types of translation processes, and implementation dimensions are explained. Specifically, we address how research-practice partnerships can reduce time to dissemination, how designing for modularity can allow for contextual adaptation, how articulating core components can strengthen fidelity and guide adaptation, and how establishing technical assistance infrastructure supports these processes. Finally, we review strategies for building capacity in D&I research and practice for nutrition professionals. In sum, the research and knowledge bases from prevention and implementation sciences offer guidance on designing and delivering family interventions in ways that maximize the potential for their broad dissemination, reducing time to translation and optimizing interventions for real-world settings.

Citing Articles

User-centered design and development of a web-based tool to support healthy feeding practices by parents of urban minority youth at risk for childhood obesity.

Mateo K, Vilme H, Verdaguer S, Fuqua A, Hoyt K, Davis J Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241298433.

PMID: 39640964 PMC: 11618903. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241298433.

References
1.
Auld G, Baker S, Conway L, Dollahite J, Lambea M, McGirr K . Outcome effectiveness of the widely adopted EFNEP curriculum Eating Smart-Being Active. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 47(1):19-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.07.001. View

2.
Vaughn A, Ward D, Fisher J, Faith M, Hughes S, Kremers S . Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research. Nutr Rev. 2016; 74(2):98-117. PMC: 4892304. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv061. View

3.
Benjamin S, Tate D, Bangdiwala S, Neelon B, Ammerman A, Dodds J . Preparing Child Care Health Consultants to address childhood overweight: a randomized controlled trial comparing web to in-person training. Matern Child Health J. 2007; 12(5):662-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-007-0277-1. View

4.
Backman D, Haddad E, Lee J, Johnston P, Hodgkin G . Psychosocial predictors of healthful dietary behavior in adolescents. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002; 34(4):184-92. DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60092-4. View

5.
Gottfredson D, Cook T, Gardner F, Gorman-Smith D, Howe G, Sandler I . Standards of Evidence for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Scale-up Research in Prevention Science: Next Generation. Prev Sci. 2015; 16(7):893-926. PMC: 4579256. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x. View