» Articles » PMID: 32989182

Clinical Evaluation of a Patient With Symptoms of Colonic or Anorectal Motility Disorders

Overview
Date 2020 Sep 29
PMID 32989182
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, fecal incontinence, abdominal pain, and anorectal pain are problems that affect 40% of the population. They commonly present with overlapping symptoms indicating that their pathophysiology affects multiple segments of the gut as well as brain and gut interactions. Clinically, although some conditions are readily recognized, dyssynergic defecation, fecal incontinence, and anorectal pain are often missed or misdiagnosed. Consequently, the assessment of lower gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with suspected colonic or anorectal motility disorder(s) remains challenging for most clinicians. A detailed history, use of the Bristol stool form scale, prospective stool diaries, ideally through a phone App, digital rectal examination, and judicious use of complementary diagnostic tests are essential. Additionally, it is important to evaluate the impact of these problems on quality of life and psychosocial issues, because they are intricately linked with these disorders. The Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for functional gastrointestinal disorders can provide additional information often missed during history taking. Here, we discuss a systematic approach for the clinical evaluation of patients with suspected lower gastrointestinal problems, grouped under 4 common diagnostic categories. We describe how to take a detailed history, perform meticulous digital rectal examination, and use validated tools to supplement clinical evaluation, including assessments of quality of life and scoring systems for disease severity and digital Apps. These tools could facilitate a comprehensive plan for clinical management including diagnostic tests, and translate the patients' complaints into definable, diagnostic categories.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and repeatability of ultrasound-guided surface electroenterography to measure colonic slow wave motility in healthy adults.

Rolleman N, Visser I, Klein W, van Putten M, de Blaauw I, Botden S BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):114.

PMID: 38500056 PMC: 10949649. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03196-w.


Organizing and Developing a GI Motility Lab in Community Practice: Challenges and Rewards.

Baker J, Curtin B, Moshiree B, Rao S Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2022; 24(6):73-87.

PMID: 35674875 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-022-00838-5.


Is evaluation by questionnaires sufficient to cover all aspects of bowel symptoms in rectal cancer patients after low anterior resection?.

Asnong A, dHoore A, Wolthuis A, Van Molhem Y, Van Geluwe B, Devoogdt N Colorectal Dis. 2022; 24(5):611-620.

PMID: 35040548 PMC: 9306656. DOI: 10.1111/codi.16055.

References
1.
Sackett D . Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1986; 89(2 Suppl):2S-3S. View

2.
Thompson W . The irritable bowel. Gut. 1984; 25(3):305-20. PMC: 1432283. DOI: 10.1136/gut.25.3.305. View

3.
Rao S, Singh S . Clinical utility of colonic and anorectal manometry in chronic constipation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010; 44(9):597-609. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181e88532. View

4.
Chiarioni G, Nardo A, Vantini I, Romito A, Whitehead W . Biofeedback is superior to electrogalvanic stimulation and massage for treatment of levator ani syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2010; 138(4):1321-9. PMC: 2847007. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.040. View

5.
Camilleri M, Bharucha A, Di Lorenzo C, Hasler W, Prather C, Rao S . American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society consensus statement on intraluminal measurement of gastrointestinal and colonic motility in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008; 20(12):1269-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01230.x. View