» Articles » PMID: 32987625

Study on the Spatial Differentiation of Public Health Service Capabilities of European Union Under the Background of the COVID-19 Crisis

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Sep 29
PMID 32987625
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Access to public health services is a cause that benefits the people and concerns the vital interests of the people. Everyone has access to basic health care services. The continuous improvement in people's health is an important indicator of the improvement in people's quality of life. This paper selects data from the European Union (EU) on aspects of public health expenditure, medical care resources, and government emergency coordination capacity from the period 2008 to 2017. Principal component analysis and factor analysis are used to measure their public health service capacity scores and conduct a comparative analysis. On this basis, the TOBIT model is adopted to explore the driving factors that lead to the spatial differentiation of public health service capabilities, and to combine it with the data of the COVID-19 epidemic as of 8 August 2020 from the official announcements of the World Health Organization and governments for further thinking. The results indicate that the public health service capacity of countries in the EU is showing a gradual increase. The capacity in Western Europe is, in turn, higher than that of Northern Europe, Southern Europe and Eastern Europe. In addition, the overall capacity in Western Europe is relatively high, but it is not balanced and stable, while Northern Europe has remained stable and balanced at a high level. Population density, degree of opening up, education level, economic development level, technological innovation level, and degree of aging have a positive effect on public health service capabilities. The level of urbanization has a negative effect on it. However, in countries with strong public health service capabilities, the epidemic of COVID-19 is more severe. The emergence of this paradox may be related to the detection capabilities of countries, the high probability of spreading thCOVID-19 epidemic, the inefficient implementation of government policy, the integrated system of the EU and the adverse selection of youth. This paper aims to improve the ability of the EU to respond to public health emergencies, improve the utilization of medical and health resources, and better protect people's health from the perspective of public health service capacity.

Citing Articles

The causal configurations of provincial health policy innovation in China: an analysis of the food safety standard filing policy.

Li L, Han G, Chen Y, Zhang Z, Fu X Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1259717.

PMID: 38098815 PMC: 10719837. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1259717.


Metrics and indicators used to assess health system resilience in response to shocks to health systems in high income countries-A systematic review.

Fleming P, ODonoghue C, Almirall-Sanchez A, Mockler D, Keegan C, Cylus J Health Policy. 2022; 126(12):1195-1205.

PMID: 36257867 PMC: 9556803. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.10.001.


Assessing Urban Policies in a COVID-19 World.

Sleszynski P, Legutko-Kobus P, Rosenberg M, Pantyley V, Nowak M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(9).

PMID: 35564718 PMC: 9103231. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095322.


Dynamics of Public Spending on Health and Socio-Economic Development in the European Union: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Sustainable Development Goals.

Pena-Sanchez A, Ruiz-Chico J, Jimenez-Garcia M Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(3).

PMID: 33804622 PMC: 8003762. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9030353.


A comparative study of strategies for containing the COVID-19 pandemic in Gulf Cooperation Council countries and the European Union.

Alanezi F, Althumairi A, Aljaffary A, Alfayez A, Alsalman D, Alhodaib H Inform Med Unlocked. 2021; 23:100547.

PMID: 33754126 PMC: 7969830. DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100547.


References
1.
Gericke C, Busse R . Policies for disease prevention in Germany in the European context: a comparative analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2004; 26(3):230-8. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh149. View

2.
Fraser A, Szymanski P, Macintyre E, Landray M . Regulating drugs, medical devices, and diagnostic tests in the European Union: early lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic?. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(23):2140-2144. PMC: 7337778. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa506. View

3.
Nunes R, Nunes S, Rego G . Health care as a universal right. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2017; 25(1):1-9. PMC: 5236078. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-016-0762-3. View

4.
Bornioli A, Evans D, Cotter C . Evaluation of the UK Public Health Skills and Knowledge Framework (PHSKF): implications for international competency frameworks. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):956. PMC: 7301561. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09024-6. View

5.
Parham P, Waldock J, Christophides G, Hemming D, Agusto F, Evans K . Climate, environmental and socio-economic change: weighing up the balance in vector-borne disease transmission. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015; 370(1665). PMC: 4342957. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0551. View