» Articles » PMID: 32984551

Management of Children Visiting the Emergency Department During Out-of-office Hours: an Observational Study

Abstract

Background: The aim was to study the characteristics and management of children visiting the emergency department (ED) during out-of-office hours.

Methods: We analysed electronic health record data from 119 204 children visiting one of five EDs in four European countries. Patient characteristics and management (diagnostic tests, treatment, hospital admission and paediatric intensive care unit admission) were compared between children visiting during office hours and evening shifts, night shifts and weekend day shifts. Analyses were corrected for age, gender, Manchester Triage System urgency, abnormal vital signs, presenting problems and hospital.

Results: Patients presenting at night were younger (median (IQR) age: 3.7 (1.4-8.2) years vs 4.8 (1.8-9.9)), more often classified as high urgent (16.3% vs 9.9%) and more often had ≥2 abnormal vital signs (22.8% vs 18.1%) compared with office hours. After correcting for disease severity, laboratory and radiological tests were less likely to be requested (adjusted OR (aOR): 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86 and aOR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.67, respectively); treatment was more likely to be undertaken (aOR: 1.56, 95% CI 1.49-1.63) and patients were more likely to be admitted to the hospital (aOR: 1.32, 95% CI 1.24-1.41) at night. Patterns in management during out-of-office hours were comparable between the different hospitals, with variability remaining.

Conclusions: Children visiting during the night are relatively more seriously ill, highlighting the need to keep improving emergency care on a 24-hour-a-day basis. Further research is needed to explain the differences in management during the night and how these differences affect patient outcomes.

Citing Articles

Practice variation across five European paediatric emergency departments: a prospective observational study.

Ropers F, Bossuyt P, Maconochie I, Smit F, Alves C, Greber-Platzer S BMJ Open. 2022; 12(3):e053382.

PMID: 35361639 PMC: 8971764. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053382.

References
1.
Zachariasse J, Nieboer D, Maconochie I, Smit F, Alves C, Greber-Platzer S . Development and validation of a Paediatric Early Warning Score for use in the emergency department: a multicentre study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020; 4(8):583-591. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30139-5. View

2.
Lee J, Oh S, Peck E, Lee J, Park K, Kim S . The validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011; 19:68. PMC: 3223131. DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-68. View

3.
Seiger N, van Veen M, Almeida H, Steyerberg E, van Meurs A, Carneiro R . Improving the Manchester Triage System for pediatric emergency care: an international multicenter study. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e83267. PMC: 3893080. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083267. View

4.
Peeters B, Jansen N, Bollen C, van Vught A, van der Heide D, Albers M . Off-hours admission and mortality in two pediatric intensive care units without 24-h in-house senior staff attendance. Intensive Care Med. 2010; 36(11):1923-7. PMC: 2952107. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-2020-4. View

5.
Thabet F, AlHaffaf F, Bougmiza I, Bafaqih H, Chehab M, alMohaimeed S . Off-Hours Admissions and Mortality in PICU Without 24-Hour Onsite Intensivist Coverage. J Intensive Care Med. 2018; 35(7):694-699. DOI: 10.1177/0885066618778824. View