» Articles » PMID: 32983649

Numerical Investigation of Microbial Quorum Sensing Under Various Flow Conditions

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2020 Sep 28
PMID 32983649
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microorganisms efficiently coordinate phenotype expressions through a decision-making process known as quorum sensing (QS). We investigated QS amongst distinct, spatially distributed microbial aggregates under various flow conditions using a process-driven numerical model. Model simulations assess the conditions suitable for QS induction and quantify the importance of advective transport of signaling molecules. In addition, advection dilutes signaling molecules so that faster flow conditions require higher microbial densities, faster signal production rates, or higher sensitivities to signaling molecules to induce QS. However, autoinduction of signal production can substantially increase the transport distance of signaling molecules in both upstream and downstream directions. We present empirical approximations to the solutions of the advection-diffusion-reaction equation that describe the concentration profiles of signaling molecules for a wide range of flow and reaction rates. These empirical relationships, which predict the distribution of dissolved solutes along pore channels, allow to quantitatively estimate the effective communication distances amongst multiple microbial aggregates without further numerical simulations.

Citing Articles

Emergent robustness of bacterial quorum sensing in fluid flow.

Dalwadi M, Pearce P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(10).

PMID: 33658377 PMC: 7958174. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2022312118.

References
1.
Pai A, Tanouchi Y, You L . Optimality and robustness in quorum sensing (QS)-mediated regulation of a costly public good enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(48):19810-5. PMC: 3511743. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211072109. View

2.
Tang L, Zhao C, Wang X, Li R, Yang J, Huang Y . Macromolecular crowding of molecular imprinting: A facile pathway to produce drug delivery devices for zero-order sustained release. Int J Pharm. 2015; 496(2):822-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.031. View

3.
Fuqua W, Winans S, Greenberg E . Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol. 1994; 176(2):269-75. PMC: 205046. DOI: 10.1128/jb.176.2.269-275.1994. View

4.
Heilmann S, Krishna S, Kerr B . Why do bacteria regulate public goods by quorum sensing?-How the shapes of cost and benefit functions determine the form of optimal regulation. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6:767. PMC: 4517451. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00767. View

5.
Gao R, Stock A . Overcoming the Cost of Positive Autoregulation by Accelerating the Response with a Coupled Negative Feedback. Cell Rep. 2018; 24(11):3061-3071.e6. PMC: 6194859. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.023. View