Differential Longitudinal Outcomes of In-Person and Cyber Victimization in Early Adolescence

Overview

Journal Psychol Violence

Date 2020 Sep 28

PMID 32983587

Authors

Krista R Mehari

Erin L Thompson

Albert D Farrell

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Few studies have tested a commonly held assumption that cyber victimization is more harmful than in-person victimization. This study examined differential longitudinal relations between in-person and cyber victimization and outcomes, including problem behaviors and distress symptoms. Possible moderation by gender and grade was also explored.

Method: Participants were 1,542 sixth, seventh, and eighth grade students (77% African American or Black; 21% Latino/a) who completed surveys in the fall, winter, spring, and summer.

Results: The two forms of victimization combined to predict increases in physical and relational aggression, cyberbullying, and delinquency, but victimization did not predict increases in distress or substance use. There were generally no differences in the strength of relations between in-person and cyber victimization for longitudinal outcomes, although there were some cross-sectional differences. Cyber victimization predicted increases in delinquency for boys but not for girls, but there were no other differences in effects across gender or grade.

Conclusions: Overall, there was little support for the argument that cyber victimization produces greater harm than in-person victimization. Future research examining outcomes of cyber victimization should focus on longitudinal relations, given the different patterns of outcomes in this study's cross-sectional and longitudinal findings.

References

Modecki K, Minchin J, Harbaugh A, Guerra N, Runions K . Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health. 2014; 55(5):602-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007. View

Ttofi M, Farrington D, Losel F, Crago R, Theodorakis N . School bullying and drug use later in life: A meta-analytic investigation. Sch Psychol Q. 2015; 31(1):8-27. DOI: 10.1037/spq0000120. View

Farrell A, Sullivan T, Sutherland K, Corona R, Masho S . Evaluation of the Olweus Bully Prevention Program in an Urban School System in the USA. Prev Sci. 2018; 19(6):833-847. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-018-0923-4. View

Farrell A, Thompson E, Mehari K, Sullivan T, Goncy E . Assessment of In-Person and Cyber Aggression and Victimization, Substance Use, and Delinquent Behavior During Early Adolescence. Assessment. 2018; 27(6):1213-1229. PMC: 6584058. DOI: 10.1177/1073191118792089. View

Kowalski R, Giumetti G, Schroeder A, Lattanner M . Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol Bull. 2014; 140(4):1073-137. DOI: 10.1037/a0035618. View

Graham S, Bellmore A, Nishina A, Juvonen J . "It must be me": ethnic diversity and attributions for peer victimization in middle school. J Youth Adolesc. 2009; 38(4):487-99. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-008-9386-4. View

Salmivalli C, Sainio M, Hodges E . Electronic victimization: correlates, antecedents, and consequences among elementary and middle school students. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013; 42(4):442-53. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2012.759228. View

Gamez-Guadix M, Orue I, Smith P, Calvete E . Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic internet use among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013; 53(4):446-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.03.030. View

Kowalski R, Limber S . Electronic bullying among middle school students. J Adolesc Health. 2007; 41(6 Suppl 1):S22-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017. View

10.

Casper D, Card N . Overt and Relational Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review of Their Overlap and Associations With Social-Psychological Adjustment. Child Dev. 2016; 88(2):466-483. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12621. View

11.

Landoll R, La Greca A, Lai B . Aversive Peer Experiences on Social Networking Sites: Development of the (). J Res Adolesc. 2013; 23(4). PMC: 3839674. DOI: 10.1111/jora.12022. View

12.

Mathews T, Dempsey M, Overstreet S . Effects of exposure to community violence on school functioning: the mediating role of posttraumatic stress symptoms. Behav Res Ther. 2009; 47(7):586-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.04.001. View

13.

Satorra A, Bentler P . Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic. Psychometrika. 2010; 75(2):243-248. PMC: 2905175. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y. View

14.

Farrell A, Sullivan T, Goncy E, Le A . Assessment of adolescents' victimization, aggression, and problem behaviors: Evaluation of the Problem Behavior Frequency Scale. Psychol Assess. 2015; 28(6):702-714. PMC: 6714549. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000225. View

15.

Lopez C, DuBois D . Peer victimization and rejection: investigation of an integrative model of effects on emotional, behavioral, and academic adjustment in early adolescence. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005; 34(1):25-36. DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_3. View

16.

Wang J, Iannotti R, Nansel T . School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. J Adolesc Health. 2009; 45(4):368-75. PMC: 2751860. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021. View

17.

Bannink R, Broeren S, van de Looij-Jansen P, de Waart F, Raat H . Cyber and traditional bullying victimization as a risk factor for mental health problems and suicidal ideation in adolescents. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e94026. PMC: 3981739. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094026. View