» Articles » PMID: 32982603

Stopping Rules for Computer Adaptive Testing When Item Banks Have Nonuniform Information

Overview
Journal Int J Test
Date 2020 Sep 28
PMID 32982603
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The () stopping rule, which terminates a (CAT) when the SE is less than a threshold, is effective when there are informative questions for all trait levels. However, in domains such as patient reported outcomes, the items in a bank might all target one end of the trait continuum (e.g., negative symptoms), and the bank may lack depth for many individuals. In such cases, the (PSER) stopping rule will stop the CAT even if the threshold has not been reached, and can avoid administering excessive questions that provide little additional information. By tuning the parameters of the PSER algorithm, a practitioner can specify a desired tradeoff between accuracy and efficiency Using simulated data for the PROMIS and banks, we demonstrate that these parameters can substantially impact CAT performance. When the parameters were optimally tuned, the PSER stopping rule was found to outperform the stopping rule overall and particularly for individuals not targeted by the bank, and presented roughly the same number of items across the trait continuum. Therefore, the PSER stopping rule provides an effective method for balancing the precision and efficiency of a CAT.

Citing Articles

Psychometrics of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system in von Willebrand disease, inherited platelet function disorders, and rare bleeding disorders.

van Hoorn E, Willems S, Al Arashi W, de Moor A, van Kwawegen C, Teela L Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024; 8(4):102474.

PMID: 39076727 PMC: 11284954. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102474.


Measurement and structural invariance of a neuropsychological battery among Middle Eastern/North African, Black, and White older adults.

Zahodne L, Brauer S, Tarraf W, Morris E, Antonucci T, Ajrouch K Neuropsychology. 2023; 37(8):975-984.

PMID: 36996172 PMC: 10544699. DOI: 10.1037/neu0000902.

References
1.
Rose M, Bjorner J, Becker J, Fries J, Ware J . Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 61(1):17-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.025. View

2.
Riley B, Conrad K, Bezruczko N, Dennis M . Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: the GAIN substance problem scale. J Appl Meas. 2007; 8(1):48-64. PMC: 5933849. View

3.
Choi S, Swartz R . Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items. Appl Psychol Meas. 2009; 33(6):419-440. PMC: 2791416. DOI: 10.1177/0146621608327801. View

4.
Castrejon I, Gossec L, Carmona L . The EULAR Outcome Measures Library: an evolutional database of validated patient-reported instruments. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 74(2):475-6. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206485. View

5.
Bruce B, Fries J, Lingala B, Hussain Y, Krishnan E . Development and assessment of floor and ceiling items for the PROMIS physical function item bank. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013; 15(5):R144. PMC: 3978724. DOI: 10.1186/ar4327. View