» Articles » PMID: 32980589

Biofeedback Augmenting Lower Limb Loading Alters the Underlying Temporal Structure of Gait Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview
Journal Hum Mov Sci
Specialty Physiology
Date 2020 Sep 27
PMID 32980589
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biofeedback has recently been explored to target deviant lower extremity loading mechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to mitigate the development of post traumatic osteoarthritis. The impact this feedback has on the structure of the stride interval dynamics-a barometer of gait system health-however, have yet to be examined. This study was designed to assess how feedback, used to alter lower-extremity loading during gait, affects the structure of stride interval variability by examining long-range stride-to-stride correlations during gait in those with unilateral ACLR. Twelve participants walked under three separate loading conditions: (1) control (i.e., no cue) (2) high loading, and (3) low loading. Baseline vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) data was used to calculate a target 5% change in vGRF for the appropriate loading condition (i.e., high loading was +5% vGRF, low loading was -5% vGRF). The target for the load condition was displayed on a screen along with real-time vGRF values, prescribing changes in stride-to-stride peak vertical ground reaction forces of each limb. From time-series of stride intervals (i.e., duration), we analyzed the mean and standard deviation of stride-to-stride variability and, via detrended fluctuation analysis (i.e., DFA α), temporal persistence for each feedback condition. Both the high and low loading conditions exhibited a change toward more temporally persistent stride intervals (high loading: α =0.92, low loading: α = 0.98) than walking under the control condition (α = 0.78; high vs. control: p = .026, low vs. control: p = .001). Overall, these results indicate that altering lower extremity load changes the temporal persistence of the stride internal dynamics in ACLR individuals, demonstrating the implications of the design of gait training interventions and the influence feedback has on movement strategies.

Citing Articles

Analysis of Limb Loading and Lower Extremity Strength Recovery Across Time After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Bruce Leicht A, Thompson X, Queen R, Rodu J, Higgins M, Cross K Sports Health. 2024; :19417381241285859.

PMID: 39397655 PMC: 11556615. DOI: 10.1177/19417381241285859.


Lower limb coordination patterns following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A longitudinal study.

Armitano-Lago C, Bjornsen E, Lisee C, Buck A, Buttner C, Kiefer A J Sport Health Sci. 2024; 14:100988.

PMID: 39299606 PMC: 11863276. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100988.


Prolonged quadriceps latency during gait early after anterior cruciate ligament injury predicts radiographic knee osteoarthritis 6-years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Ito N, Capin J, Arhos E, Wellsandt E, Pohlig R, Buchanan T Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2024; 117:106301.

PMID: 38945068 PMC: 11250627. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106301.


Modifying loading during gait leads to biochemical changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein concentrations in a subgroup of individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Armitano-Lago C, Evans-Pickett A, Davis-Wilson H, Munsch A, Longobardi L, Willcockson H Clin Rheumatol. 2024; 43(4):1363-1373.

PMID: 38358589 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-024-06898-4.


Unraveling age-related impairment of the neuromuscular system: exploring biomechanical and neurophysiological perspectives.

Nunez-Lisboa M, Valero-Breton M, Dewolf A Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1194889.

PMID: 37427405 PMC: 10323685. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1194889.


References
1.
Troy Blackburn J, Pietrosimone B, Harkey M, Luc B, Pamukoff D . Inter-limb differences in impulsive loading following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in females. J Biomech. 2016; 49(13):3017-3021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.030. View

2.
Wang H, Fleischli J, Zheng N . Transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes of knee joint kinematics during walking. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(8):1847-56. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513490663. View

3.
Slater L, Hart J, Kelly A, Kuenze C . Progressive Changes in Walking Kinematics and Kinetics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction: A Review and Meta-Analysis. J Athl Train. 2017; 52(9):847-860. PMC: 5634233. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.6.06. View

4.
Berchuck M, Andriacchi T, Bach B, Reider B . Gait adaptations by patients who have a deficient anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72(6):871-7. View

5.
Hausdorff J, Peng C, Ladin Z, Wei J, Goldberger A . Is walking a random walk? Evidence for long-range correlations in stride interval of human gait. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995; 78(1):349-58. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1995.78.1.349. View