» Articles » PMID: 32977633

Advances on Bone Substitutes Through 3D Bioprinting

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Sep 26
PMID 32977633
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reconstruction of bony defects is challenging when conventional grafting methods are used because of their intrinsic limitations (biological cost and/or biological properties). Bone regeneration techniques are rapidly evolving since the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Bone tissue engineering is a branch of regenerative medicine that aims to find new solutions to treat bone defects, which can be repaired by 3D printed living tissues. Its aim is to overcome the limitations of conventional treatment options by improving osteoinduction and osteoconduction. Several techniques of bone bioprinting have been developed: inkjet, extrusion, and light-based 3D printers are nowadays available. Bioinks, i.e., the printing materials, also presented an evolution over the years. It seems that these new technologies might be extremely promising for bone regeneration. The purpose of the present review is to give a comprehensive summary of the past, the present, and future developments of bone bioprinting and bioinks, focusing the attention on crucial aspects of bone bioprinting such as selecting cell sources and attaining a viable vascularization within the newly printed bone. The main bioprinters currently available on the market and their characteristics have been taken into consideration, as well.

Citing Articles

Spheroid-Exosome-Based Bioprinting Technology in Regenerative Medicine.

Lee H, Lee J J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(11).

PMID: 39590549 PMC: 11595066. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15110345.


An Up-to-Date Review of Materials Science Advances in Bone Grafting for Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology.

Nicolae C, Pirvulescu D, Niculescu A, Epistatu D, Mihaiescu D, Antohi A Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(19).

PMID: 39410353 PMC: 11478239. DOI: 10.3390/ma17194782.


Bioprinting of Cells, Organoids and Organs-on-a-Chip Together with Hydrogels Improves Structural and Mechanical Cues.

Mierke C Cells. 2024; 13(19.

PMID: 39404401 PMC: 11476109. DOI: 10.3390/cells13191638.


Bioengineering from the laboratory to clinical translation in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction.

Maria O, Heram A, Tran S Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(7):955-962.

PMID: 39035556 PMC: 11255950. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.05.004.


New Generation of Osteoinductive and Antimicrobial Polycaprolactone-Based Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review.

Coppola B, Menotti F, Longo F, Banche G, Mandras N, Palmero P Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 38932017 PMC: 11207319. DOI: 10.3390/polym16121668.


References
1.
Yang J, Zhang Y, Yue K, Khademhosseini A . Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2017; 57:1-25. PMC: 5545789. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.036. View

2.
Chawla S, Midha S, Sharma A, Ghosh S . Silk-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018; 7(8):e1701204. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201701204. View

3.
Fedorovich N, Kuipers E, Gawlitta D, Dhert W, Alblas J . Scaffold porosity and oxygenation of printed hydrogel constructs affect functionality of embedded osteogenic progenitors. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011; 17(19-20):2473-86. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0001. View

4.
Chen M, Feng Z, Guo W, Yang D, Gao S, Li Y . PCL-MECM-Based Hydrogel Hybrid Scaffolds and Meniscal Fibrochondrocytes Promote Whole Meniscus Regeneration in a Rabbit Meniscectomy Model. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019; 11(44):41626-41639. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b13611. View

5.
Gao L, Kupfer M, Jung J, Yang L, Zhang P, Sie Y . Myocardial Tissue Engineering With Cells Derived From Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and a Native-Like, High-Resolution, 3-Dimensionally Printed Scaffold. Circ Res. 2017; 120(8):1318-1325. PMC: 5392171. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.310277. View