» Articles » PMID: 32974397

Comparison of Two Distraction Devices for Assessment of Passive Hip Laxity in Dogs

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2020 Sep 25
PMID 32974397
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Canine hip dysplasia is the most common orthopedic developmental condition in the dog and early hip laxity is the main risk factor. The importance of hip laxity in young animals in the development of hip dysplasia is unanimously recognized among researchers and veterinarians due to its medical applicability in terms of disease control and prevention. In the market, there is some certified hip distractors to promote joint laxity. However, the clinical use of some of these distractors complies with a set of usage rules, that can limit its medical application. In this study was compared the technical quality of radiographs and hip distraction using a certified hip distractor (CertD) and Dis-UTAD in 104 dogs (208 joints). The mean pelvic tilting of 1.5 ± 1.6° and 1.5 ± 1.8° were similar when using the CertD and the Dis-UTAD distractors, respectively ( > 0.05). In the CertD sample, the mean hip distraction index (DI) was 0.46 ± 0.17 and in the Dis-UTAD 0.46 ± 0.16; the mean DI differences was 0.001 ± 0.045, resulting in a non-significant paired -test ( = 0.65) and a significant intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96, with the 95% lower limit confidence interval of 0.95 ( < 0.05). The statistical power analysis showed a very low distraction index difference effect size. The results suggest that the statistical reproducibility of CertD hip distraction by the Dis-UTAD and the DI mean differences of 0.001 might be considered without clinical importance. The Dis-UTAD might be considered adequate to promote dog hip laxity.

Citing Articles

Early hip laxity screening and later canine hip dysplasia development.

Santana A, Alves-Pimenta S, Franco-Goncalo P, Goncalves L, Martins J, Colaco B Vet World. 2022; 15(3):679-684.

PMID: 35497953 PMC: 9047119. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.679-684.

References
1.
Ginja M, Silvestre A, Gonzalo-Orden J, Ferreira A . Diagnosis, genetic control and preventive management of canine hip dysplasia: a review. Vet J. 2009; 184(3):269-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.04.009. View

2.
Ginja M, Ferreira A, Jesus S, Melo-Pinto P, Bulas-Cruz J, Orden M . Comparison of clinical, radiographic, computed tomographic, and magnetic resonance imaging methods for early prediction of canine hip laxity and dysplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2009; 50(2):135-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01506.x. View

3.
Martins J, Colaco B, Ferreira A, Ginja M . Analysis of pelvic rotation on the standard hip ventrodorsal extended radiographic view. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2015; 29(1):68-74. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-15-02-0025. View

4.
Broeckx B, Vezzoni A, Bogaerts E, Bertal M, Bosmans T, Stock E . Comparison of Three Methods to Quantify Laxity in the Canine Hip Joint. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2018; 31(1):23-29. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT17-05-0064. View

5.
Smith G, LaFond E, Gregor T, Lawler D, Nie R . Within- and between-examiner repeatability of distraction indices of the hip joints in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1997; 58(10):1076-7. View