» Articles » PMID: 32973306

Subitizing, Unlike Estimation, Does Not Process Sets in Parallel

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Sep 25
PMID 32973306
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Enumeration of very small quantities is a common task that we perform everyday. Much research has highlighted that in these conditions humans display fast, near errorless performance, a phenomenon dubbed subitizing. It has been suggested that this regime has a pivotal role in numerosity perception. Here we asked if this system can process multiple sets of items in parallel. At odds with what happens for moderate numerosities, we found a strong impairment caused already by the introduction of a second group of items marked by a different color. Adding shape as a cue provided no benefit. The only case in which subitizing was possible was when the target and distractor group were held constant through the experimental block. These results show the surprising fact that whilst being rapid and errorless, subitizing does not have the capability to disentangle multiple groups of items and deals only with coarse stimulus statistics.

Citing Articles

Adaptation biases the parallel perception of subitized numerosities.

Liu W, Zhao X, Liu Y, Li Y, Li J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26014.

PMID: 39472716 PMC: 11522287. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76536-1.


Subitizing endures in sequential rather than simultaneous comparison tasks.

Liu W, Wang C, Tian J, Cicchini G Psych J. 2024; 13(5):726-737.

PMID: 38618757 PMC: 11444722. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.750.


Nonatopic Eosinophilic Duodenitis in an Adult: A Case Report and Overview.

Phrathep D, Mohammed M, Herson A, Healey K, El-Husari A, Herman M Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e43919.

PMID: 37746362 PMC: 10512875. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43919.


Decision-making from temporally accumulated conflicting evidence: The more the merrier.

Mocz V, Xu Y J Vis. 2023; 23(1):3.

PMID: 36598454 PMC: 9832717. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.1.3.


Number comparison under the Ebbinghaus illusion.

Liu W, Wang C, Zhao X, Deng S, Zhao Y, Zhang Z Front Psychol. 2022; 13:989680.

PMID: 36204750 PMC: 9530473. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989680.


References
1.
KAUFMAN E, LORD M . The discrimination of visual number. Am J Psychol. 1949; 62(4):498-525. View

2.
Ashkenazi S, Mark-Zigdon N, Henik A . Do subitizing deficits in developmental dyscalculia involve pattern recognition weakness?. Dev Sci. 2013; 16(1):35-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01190.x. View

3.
Anobile G, Arrighi R, Burr D . Simultaneous and sequential subitizing are separate systems, and neither predicts math abilities. J Exp Child Psychol. 2018; 178:86-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.017. View

4.
Anobile G, Cicchini G, Burr D . Number As a Primary Perceptual Attribute: A Review. Perception. 2015; 45(1-2):5-31. PMC: 5040510. DOI: 10.1177/0301006615602599. View

5.
Trick L, Pylyshyn Z . What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993; 19(2):331-51. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.2.331. View