» Articles » PMID: 32973211

Improvements and Inter-laboratory Implementation and Optimization of Blood-based Single-locus Age Prediction Models Using DNA Methylation of the ELOVL2 Promoter

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Sep 25
PMID 32973211
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several blood-based age prediction models have been developed using less than a dozen to more than a hundred DNA methylation biomarkers. Only one model (Z-P1) based on pyrosequencing has been developed using DNA methylation of a single locus located in the ELOVL2 promoter, which is considered as one of the best age-prediction biomarker. Although multi-locus models generally present better performances compared to the single-locus model, they require more DNA and present more inter-laboratory variations impacting the predictions. Here we developed 17,018 single-locus age prediction models based on DNA methylation of the ELOVL2 promoter from pooled data of four different studies (training set of 1,028 individuals aged from 0 and 91 years) using six different statistical approaches and testing every combination of the 7 CpGs, aiming to improve the prediction performances and reduce the effects of inter-laboratory variations. Compared to Z-P1 model, three statistical models with the optimal combinations of CpGs presented improved performances (MAD of 4.41-4.77 in the testing set of 385 individuals) and no age-dependent bias. In an independent testing set of 100 individuals (19-65 years), we showed that the prediction accuracy could be further improved by using different CpG combinations and increasing the number of technical replicates (MAD of 4.17).

Citing Articles

A Ge.F.I. Collaborative Study: Evaluating Reproducibility and Accuracy of a DNA-Methylation-Based Age-Predictive Assay for Routine Implementation in Forensic Casework.

Onofri M, Alessandrini F, Aneli S, Buscemi L, Chierto E, Fabbri M Electrophoresis. 2025; 46(1-2):76-91.

PMID: 39763091 PMC: 11773317. DOI: 10.1002/elps.202400190.


Longitudinal changes and variation in human DNA methylation analysed with the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip assay and their implications on forensic age prediction.

Refn M, Andersen M, Kampmann M, Tfelt-Hansen J, Sorensen E, Larsen M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):21658.

PMID: 38066081 PMC: 10709620. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49064-7.


Prediction of chronological age and its applications in forensic casework: methods, current practices, and future perspectives.

Refn M, Kampmann M, Morling N, Tfelt-Hansen J, Borsting C, Pereira V Forensic Sci Res. 2023; 8(2):85-97.

PMID: 37621446 PMC: 10445583. DOI: 10.1093/fsr/owad021.


An ELOVL2-Based Epigenetic Clock for Forensic Age Prediction: A Systematic Review.

Paparazzo E, Lagani V, Geracitano S, Citrigno L, Aceto M, Malvaso A Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(3).

PMID: 36768576 PMC: 9916975. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032254.


A Blood-Based Molecular Clock for Biological Age Estimation.

Paparazzo E, Geracitano S, Lagani V, Bartolomeo D, Aceto M, DAquila P Cells. 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36611826 PMC: 9818068. DOI: 10.3390/cells12010032.


References
1.
Lopez-Otin C, Blasco M, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G . The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013; 153(6):1194-217. PMC: 3836174. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039. View

2.
Rodriguez-Rodero S, Fernandez-Morera J, Menendez-Torre E, Calvanese V, Fernandez A, Fraga M . Aging genetics and aging. Aging Dis. 2012; 2(3):186-95. PMC: 3295054. View

3.
Jylhava J, Pedersen N, Hagg S . Biological Age Predictors. EBioMedicine. 2017; 21:29-36. PMC: 5514388. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.046. View

4.
Srettabunjong S, Satitsri S, Thongnoppakhun W, Tirawanchai N . The study on telomere length for age estimation in a Thai population. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2014; 35(2):148-53. DOI: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000095. View

5.
Zubakov D, Liu F, van Zelm M, Vermeulen J, Oostra B, van Duijn C . Estimating human age from T-cell DNA rearrangements. Curr Biol. 2010; 20(22):R970-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.022. View