» Articles » PMID: 32972642

Inside Alcohol Behavioral Couple Therapy (ABCT): In-session Speech Trajectories and Drinking Outcomes

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2020 Sep 25
PMID 32972642
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The alcohol treatment literature has established in-session client speech as a mechanism of change that therapist behavior can influence and that can predict drinking outcomes. This study aimed to explore temporal patterns of in-session speech in Alcohol Behavioral Couple Therapy (ABCT), including the unique interplay between client and partner speech and the role of speech trajectories in predicting client drinking outcomes. Participants were 165 heterosexual couples receiving ABCT in one of four clinical trials. We coded client speech on an utterance-by-utterance basis using the System for Coding Couples' Interactions in Therapy-Alcohol. We focused on individual-level speech codes of change talk and sustain talk and couple-level variables of positive and negative interactions. We segmented the initial and midtreatment sessions into quartiles to conduct path analyses and latent growth curve models. Path analyses suggested that clients and partners may not have been aligned in terms of treatment goals at the start of the therapy. This misalignment within couples was pronounced during the initial session and decreased by the midtreatment session, reflecting progression toward treatment goals. Of the latent growth curve models, only client sustain talk during the midtreatment session predicted greater client drinking at the end of treatment. Results provide insight into the inner workings of ABCT and suggest recommendations for ABCT therapists. This study also supports a growing consensus that sustain talk may be a stronger mechanism of change than change talk in various alcohol treatment interventions.

Citing Articles

Quality of Life Assessment Using the WHOQOL-BREF Survey in Hospitalized Patients with Alcohol Use Disorder from Romania.

Bratu M, Sandesc D, Anghel T, Dehelean L, Bondrescu M, Bratosin F Diseases. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39057129 PMC: 11276466. DOI: 10.3390/diseases12070158.


The Role of the Family in Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery for Adults.

McCrady B, Flanagan J Alcohol Res. 2021; 41(1):06.

PMID: 33981521 PMC: 8104924. DOI: 10.35946/arcr.v41.1.06.

References
1.
McCrady B, EPSTEIN E, Hirsch L . Maintaining change after conjoint behavioral alcohol treatment for men: outcomes at 6 months. Addiction. 2000; 94(9):1381-96. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.949138110.x. View

2.
Moyers T, Martin T, Christopher P, Houck J, Tonigan J, Amrhein P . Client language as a mediator of motivational interviewing efficacy: where is the evidence?. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007; 31(10 Suppl):40s-47s. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00492.x. View

3.
McCrady B, Noel N, Abrams D, Stout R, Nelson H, Hay W . Comparative effectiveness of three types of spouse involvement in outpatient behavioral alcoholism treatment. J Stud Alcohol. 1986; 47(6):459-67. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1986.47.459. View

4.
Magill M, Apodaca T, Borsari B, Gaume J, Hoadley A, Gordon R . A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process: Technical, relational, and conditional process models of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017; 86(2):140-157. PMC: 5958907. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000250. View

5.
Apodaca T, Magill M, Longabaugh R, Jackson K, Monti P . Effect of a significant other on client change talk in motivational interviewing. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012; 81(1):35-46. PMC: 3808251. DOI: 10.1037/a0030881. View