» Articles » PMID: 32972431

Hybrid Two-stage Repair of Stanford A Dissection with Visceral or Peripheral Malperfusion

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of two-stage hybrid aortic repair at the distal aorta of Stanford A dissection with malperfusion.

Methods: This retrospective case series included 20 patients with Stanford A dissection administered two-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) about 1 month after central repair because of visceral or limb malperfusion. The patients were examined by computed tomography (CT) angiography at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after operation. Recovery of malperfusion and true lumen index were evaluated during follow-up.

Results: Twenty patients underwent two-stage hybrid aortic repair, including 11 males and 9 females. The follow-up time was 24 ± 7 months. No intervention-related complications were observed, including stent graft-induced new re-entry tears, death, stroke and spinal cord injury. Malperfusion in all cases was corrected. The true lumen was not enlarged enough 1 month after the first surgery. Thrombosis of the false lumen was observed around the elephant trunk at the carina level and the celiac artery. Three months after second stage TEVAR, the false lumen thrombosis was resorbed; in addition, the trunk was fully expanded at the carina level, and the true lumen was enlarged at the celiac artery.

Conclusions: Two-stage hybrid aortic repair for residual true lumen in the distal aorta 1 month after initial surgery is helpful for descending aorta remodeling and effective in treating malperfusion. This procedure may be a good option for patients suffering from Stanford A dissection with small true lumen in the distal aorta and malperfusion.

Citing Articles

Anesthetic Considerations for Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta.

Valencia O, Powell T, Khalifa A, Orozco-Sevilla V, Tolpin D Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024; 29(1):49-63.

PMID: 39484793 PMC: 11872058. DOI: 10.1177/10892532241297608.

References
1.
Zhang L, Zhao Z, Chen Y, Sun Y, Bao J, Jing Z . Reintervention after endovascular repair for aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 152(5):1279-1288.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.027. View

2.
Stone D, Brewster D, Kwolek C, LaMuraglia G, Conrad M, Chung T . Stent-graft versus open-surgical repair of the thoracic aorta: mid-term results. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44(6):1188-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.005. View

3.
Leshnower B, Szeto W, Pochettino A, Desai N, Moeller P, Nathan D . Thoracic endografting reduces morbidity and remodels the thoracic aorta in DeBakey III aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 95(3):914-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.09.053. View

4.
Katayama A, Uchida N, Katayama K, Arakawa M, Sueda T . The frozen elephant trunk technique for acute type A aortic dissection: results from 15 years of experience†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 47(2):355-60. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu173. View

5.
Vallabhajosyula P, Szeto W, Desai N, Bavaria J . Type I and Type II hybrid aortic arch replacement: postoperative and mid-term outcome analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 2(3):280-7. PMC: 3741847. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.05.09. View