» Articles » PMID: 32971033

Understanding the Influence of Experimental Factors on Bio-interactions of Nanoparticles: Towards Improving Correlation Between in Vitro and in Vivo Studies

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Biochemistry
Biophysics
Date 2020 Sep 24
PMID 32971033
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bionanotechnology has developed rapidly over the past two decades, owing to the extensive and versatile, functionalities and applicability of nanoparticles (NPs). Fifty-one nanomedicines have been approved by FDA since 1995, out of the many NPs based formulations developed to date. The general conformation of NPs consists of a core with ligands coating their surface, that stabilizes them and provides them with added functionalities. The physicochemical properties, especially the surface composition of NPs influence their bio-interactions to a large extent. This review discusses recent studies that help understand the nano-bio interactions of iron oxide and gold NPs with different surface compositions. We discuss the influence of the experimental factors on the outcome of the studies and, thus, the importance of standardization in the field of nanotechnology. Recent studies suggest that with careful selection of experimental parameters, it is possible to improve the positive correlation between in vitro and in vivo studies. This provides a fundamental understanding of the NPs which helps in assessing their potential toxic side effects and may aid in manipulating them further to improve their biocompatibility and biosafety.

Citing Articles

Toxicity and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in the Organs of Mice Treated with Mesoporous Polydopamine Nanoparticles Modified with Iron and Coated with Cancer Cell Membrane.

Szukalska M, Grzeskowiak B, Bigaj-Jozefowska M, Witkowska M, Cicha E, Sujka-Kordowska P Int J Nanomedicine. 2024; 19:12053-12078.

PMID: 39583321 PMC: 11585271. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S481120.


Unveiling Nanoparticles: Recent Approaches in Studying the Internalization Pattern of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Mono- and Multicellular Biological Structures.

Petcov T, Straticiuc M, Iancu D, Mirea D, Trusca R, Mereuta P J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(6).

PMID: 38921542 PMC: 11204647. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15060169.


Tackling breast cancer with gold nanoparticles: twinning synthesis and particle engineering with efficacy.

Mal S, Chakraborty S, Mahapatra M, Pakeeraiah K, Das S, Paidesetty S Nanoscale Adv. 2024; 6(11):2766-2812.

PMID: 38817429 PMC: 11134266. DOI: 10.1039/d3na00988b.


Biodistribution Analysis of Peptide-Coated Magnetic Iron Nanoparticles: A Simple and Quantitative Method.

Natarajan P, Horak K, Rowe J, Yoon S, Lingo J, Tomich J Mol Pharm. 2024; 21(2):970-981.

PMID: 38206824 PMC: 10918533. DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c01080.


Nanoparticles cellular uptake, trafficking, activation, toxicity and evaluation.

Toscano F, Torres-Arias M Curr Res Immunol. 2023; 4:100073.

PMID: 38020531 PMC: 10663637. DOI: 10.1016/j.crimmu.2023.100073.


References
1.
Nash J, Tucker T, Therriault W, Yingling Y . Binding of single stranded nucleic acids to cationic ligand functionalized gold nanoparticles. Biointerphases. 2016; 11(4):04B305. DOI: 10.1116/1.4966653. View

2.
Mulvaney P, Weiss P . Have Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Delivered?. ACS Nano. 2016; 10(8):7225-6. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05344. View

3.
Sahay G, Alakhova D, Kabanov A . Endocytosis of nanomedicines. J Control Release. 2010; 145(3):182-95. PMC: 2902597. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.01.036. View

4.
Farokhzad O, Langer R . Impact of nanotechnology on drug delivery. ACS Nano. 2009; 3(1):16-20. DOI: 10.1021/nn900002m. View

5.
Feng Q, Liu Y, Huang J, Chen K, Huang J, Xiao K . Uptake, distribution, clearance, and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles with different sizes and coatings. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):2082. PMC: 5794763. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-19628-z. View