» Articles » PMID: 32970334

Sporadic Anovulation is Not an Important Determinant of Becoming Pregnant and Time to Pregnancy Among Eumenorrheic Women: A Simulation Study

Overview
Date 2020 Sep 24
PMID 32970334
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Attaining pregnancy is conditional upon a series of complex processes, including adequately timed intercourse, ovulation, fertilisation, and implantation. Anovulation is a first-line treatment target for couples with difficulty conceiving and is frequently examined in studies of fecundability.

Objectives: To identify whether sporadic anovulation is an important determinant of cumulative pregnancy rates and time to pregnancy among fertile women with regular menstrual cycles.

Methods: We simulated cumulative pregnancy rates and time to pregnancy for 12 consecutive menstrual cycles among 100 000 women based on data-driven probabilities of implantation, fertilisation, ovulation, and intercourse occurring in the fertile window. We assumed anovulation probabilities of 1%, 8%, or 14.5% and intercourse averaging once per week, every other day, or daily. The model incorporated reductions in implantation and fertilisation rates for successive cycles of non-pregnancy.

Results: After 12 cycles, a reduction in the per cycle incidence of anovulation from 14.5% to 1% resulted in a 4.0% higher cumulative pregnancy rate (86.7% vs 90.7%) and similar time to pregnancy (1-cycle median difference). In contrast, increasing mean unscheduled sexual intercourse frequency from weekly to every other day was associated with a 5-cycle median reduction in time to pregnancy (weekly: 7 cycles; every other day or daily: 2 cycles) and a 28.9% increase in the cumulative pregnancy rate (weekly: 59.9%, every other day: 88.8%; daily: 91.6%).

Conclusions: In presumed fertile women with regular menstrual cycles, routine investigation of anovulation may not be an informative outcome in studies of fecundability, and routine testing to ensure ovulation and treatment of anovulation are unlikely to be medically necessary. While biomarkers or cervical fluid may help time intercourse to the fertile window, time to pregnancy can also be improved through increasing the frequency of unscheduled intercourse. These findings need corroboration in large preconception time to pregnancy studies.

Citing Articles

Improved reproductive outcomes in normogonadotropic oligomenorrheic women undergoing ovarian stimulation with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective cohort analysis of real-world data.

Li S, Long Y, Wang C, Yang R, Lv J, Chen Z Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1441796.

PMID: 39444447 PMC: 11496073. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1441796.


Routine assessment of ovulation is unlikely to be medically necessary among eumenorrheic women.

DeVilbiss E, Sjaarda L, Mumford S Fertil Steril. 2020; 114(6):1187-1188.

PMID: 32907750 PMC: 7994021. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.014.

References
1.
Schulte M, Tsai J, Moley K . Obesity and PCOS: the effect of metabolic derangements on endometrial receptivity at the time of implantation. Reprod Sci. 2014; 22(1):6-14. PMC: 4275454. DOI: 10.1177/1933719114561552. View

2.
Stanford J . Revisiting the fertile window. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103(5):1152-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.015. View

3.
Wilcox A, Baird D, Dunson D, McConnaughey D, Kesner J, Weinberg C . On the frequency of intercourse around ovulation: evidence for biological influences. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(7):1539-43. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh305. View

4.
Behre H, Kuhlage J, Gassner C, Sonntag B, Schem C, Schneider H . Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan Fertility Monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(12):2478-82. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.12.2478. View

5.
RITCHIE W . Ultrasound in the evaluation of normal and induced ovulation. Fertil Steril. 1985; 43(2):167-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48369-x. View