» Articles » PMID: 32969504

Predictors of Increase in Pacing Threshold After Transcatheter Pacing System Implantation Due to Micro-dislodgement

Overview
Date 2020 Sep 24
PMID 32969504
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Achieving a favorable pacing threshold with a Micra transcatheter pacing system (Micra-TPS) is needed to reduce battery depletion. In some cases, the threshold increases shortly after the device is implanted, and a higher pacing threshold may be required. This study aims to identify the causes and predictors of the increase in pacing threshold observed shortly after Micra-TPS implantation.

Methods: The study included 64 consecutive patients who underwent Micra-TPS implantation between 2017 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups depending on their pacing threshold: the increased pacing threshold (IPT) group (threshold increased by ≥0.5 V/0.24 ms within 1 month of implantation) and the stable pacing threshold (SPT) group.

Results: Excluding four patients who could not be followed up, of the 60 remaining patients, nine (15%) were in the IPT group and 51 (85%) were in the SPT group. The IPT group had significantly lower implant impedance values and higher implant thresholds than the SPT group (582 ± 59 vs 755 ± 167 Ω [P < .001] and 1.29 ± 0.87 vs 0.71 ± 0.40 V/0.24 ms [P = .014]). Implant impedance and threshold may serve as predictors of a threshold increase after implantation (area under the curve: 0.737-0.943 and 0.586-0.926, respectively).

Conclusions: An IPT was noted shortly after Micra-TPS implantation owing to micro-dislodgement because of insufficient anchoring of the device to the myocardium. Impedance >660 Ω and threshold <1.0 V/0.24 ms may predict an increase in pacing threshold.

Citing Articles

Acute increase in pacing capture threshold and impedance post-leadless pacemaker implant with spontaneous resolution.

Tan J, Epstein A, Markman T HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2024; 10(7):453-455.

PMID: 39129737 PMC: 11312035. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.03.016.


A broken tine as a possible explanation for rise in pacing threshold in a leadless pacemaker.

Doshi R, Kleinhans A HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2023; 9(8):573-575.

PMID: 37614395 PMC: 10444565. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2023.05.017.


Leadless pacemaker: Should repositioning be needed despite a good threshold?.

Nakamura T, Fukuzawa K, Kiuchi K, Takami M, Hirata K Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2023; 23(4):130-132.

PMID: 37060993 PMC: 10323175. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2023.04.013.


Fluoroscopic predictors of acceptable capture threshold during the implantation of the micra transcatheter pacing system.

Togashi I, Sato T, Maeda A, Mohri T, Katsume Y, Tashiro M J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022; 33(6):1255-1261.

PMID: 35304791 PMC: 9315022. DOI: 10.1111/jce.15457.