Visual Mate Preference Evolution During Butterfly Speciation is Linked to Neural Processing Genes

Overview

Journal Nat Commun

Specialty Biology

Date 2020 Sep 22

PMID 32958765

Citations 16

Authors

Matteo Rossi

Alexander E Hausmann

Timothy J Thurman

Stephen H Montgomery

Riccardo Papa

Chris D Jiggins

W Owen McMillan

Richard M Merrill

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Many animal species remain separate not because their individuals fail to produce viable hybrids but because they "choose" not to mate. However, we still know very little of the genetic mechanisms underlying changes in these mate preference behaviours. Heliconius butterflies display bright warning patterns, which they also use to recognize conspecifics. Here, we couple QTL for divergence in visual preference behaviours with population genomic and gene expression analyses of neural tissue (central brain, optic lobes and ommatidia) across development in two sympatric Heliconius species. Within a region containing 200 genes, we identify five genes that are strongly associated with divergent visual preferences. Three of these have previously been implicated in key components of neural signalling (specifically an ionotropic glutamate receptor and two regucalcins), and overall our candidates suggest shifts in behaviour involve changes in visual integration or processing. This would allow preference evolution without altering perception of the wider environment.

Citing Articles

Two major-effect loci influence interspecific mating in females of the sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.

Lu K, Erezyilmaz D G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 15(2).

PMID: 39607704 PMC: 11797031. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae279.

Beyond genes-for-behaviour: The potential for genomics to resolve long-standing questions in avian brood parasitism.

Ronka K, Eroukhmanoff F, Kulmuni J, Nouhaud P, Thorogood R Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(11):e70335.

PMID: 39575141 PMC: 11581780. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70335.

Adaptive introgression of a visual preference gene.

Rossi M, Hausmann A, Alcami P, Moest M, Roussou R, Van Belleghem S Science. 2024; 383(6689):1368-1373.

PMID: 38513020 PMC: 7616200. DOI: 10.1126/science.adj9201.

Search Behavior of Individual Foragers Involves Neurotransmitter Systems Characteristic for Social Scouting.

Chatterjee A, Bais D, Brockmann A, Ramesh D Front Insect Sci. 2024; 1:664978.

PMID: 38468879 PMC: 10926421. DOI: 10.3389/finsc.2021.664978.

Adult neurogenesis does not explain the extensive post-eclosion growth of mushroom bodies.

Alcalde Anton A, Young F, Melo-Florez L, Couto A, Cross S, McMillan W R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(10):230755.

PMID: 37885989 PMC: 10598442. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230755.

References

Davey J, Chouteau M, Barker S, Maroja L, Baxter S, Simpson F . Major Improvements to the Heliconius melpomene Genome Assembly Used to Confirm 10 Chromosome Fusion Events in 6 Million Years of Butterfly Evolution. G3 (Bethesda). 2016; 6(3):695-708. PMC: 4777131. DOI: 10.1534/g3.115.023655. View

Zaccardi G, Kelber A, Sison-Mangus M, Briscoe A . Color discrimination in the red range with only one long-wavelength sensitive opsin. J Exp Biol. 2006; 209(Pt 10):1944-55. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02207. View

Jiggins C, Naisbit R, Coe R, Mallet J . Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature. 2001; 411(6835):302-5. DOI: 10.1038/35077075. View

Jiggins C, Estrada C, Rodrigues A . Mimicry and the evolution of premating isolation in Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. J Evol Biol. 2004; 17(3):680-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00675.x. View

van Schooten B, Melendez-Rosa J, Van Belleghem S, Jiggins C, Tan J, McMillan W . Divergence of chemosensing during the early stages of speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(28):16438-16447. PMC: 7371972. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921318117. View

Bay R, Arnegard M, Conte G, Best J, Bedford N, McCann S . Genetic Coupling of Female Mate Choice with Polygenic Ecological Divergence Facilitates Stickleback Speciation. Curr Biol. 2017; 27(21):3344-3349.e4. PMC: 5687276. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.037. View

Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W . HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31(2):166-9. PMC: 4287950. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. View

Brand P, Hinojosa-Diaz I, Ayala R, Daigle M, Yurrita Obiols C, Eltz T . The evolution of sexual signaling is linked to odorant receptor tuning in perfume-collecting orchid bees. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):244. PMC: 6957680. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14162-6. View

Servedio M, van Doorn G, Kopp M, Frame A, Nosil P . Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 26(8):389-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.005. View

10.

Monteiro A . Gene regulatory networks reused to build novel traits: co-option of an eye-related gene regulatory network in eye-like organs and red wing patches on insect wings is suggested by optix expression. Bioessays. 2012; 34(3):181-6. DOI: 10.1002/bies.201100160. View

11.

Weber J, Peterson B, Hoekstra H . Discrete genetic modules are responsible for complex burrow evolution in Peromyscus mice. Nature. 2013; 493(7432):402-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature11816. View

12.

Finn R, Attwood T, Babbitt P, Bateman A, Bork P, Bridge A . InterPro in 2017-beyond protein family and domain annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 45(D1):D190-D199. PMC: 5210578. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1107. View

13.

Delclos P, Forero S, Rosenthal G . Divergent neurogenomic responses shape social learning of both personality and mate preference. J Exp Biol. 2020; 223(Pt 6). DOI: 10.1242/jeb.220707. View

14.

Bashaw G, Klein R . Signaling from axon guidance receptors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010; 2(5):a001941. PMC: 2857166. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001941. View

15.

Martin S, Dasmahapatra K, Nadeau N, Salazar C, Walters J, Simpson F . Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res. 2013; 23(11):1817-28. PMC: 3814882. DOI: 10.1101/gr.159426.113. View

16.

Yamaguchi M . Role of regucalcin in brain calcium signaling: involvement in aging. Integr Biol (Camb). 2012; 4(8):825-37. DOI: 10.1039/c2ib20042b. View

17.

Chouteau M, Llaurens V, Piron-Prunier F, Joron M . Polymorphism at a mimicry supergene maintained by opposing frequency-dependent selection pressures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(31):8325-8329. PMC: 5547605. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702482114. View

18.

McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A . The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010; 20(9):1297-303. PMC: 2928508. DOI: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. View

19.

Roberts A, Pimentel H, Trapnell C, Pachter L . Identification of novel transcripts in annotated genomes using RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(17):2325-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr355. View

20.

Love M, Huber W, Anders S . Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(12):550. PMC: 4302049. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. View