» Articles » PMID: 32957650

Analysis of Bone Scans in Various Tumor Entities Using a Deep-Learning-Based Artificial Neural Network Algorithm-Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Sep 22
PMID 32957650
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The bone scan index (BSI), initially introduced for metastatic prostate cancer, quantifies the osseous tumor load from planar bone scans. Following the basic idea of radiomics, this method incorporates specific deep-learning techniques (artificial neural network) in its development to provide automatic calculation, feature extraction, and diagnostic support. As its performance in tumor entities, not including prostate cancer, remains unclear, our aim was to obtain more data about this aspect. The results of BSI evaluation of bone scans from 951 consecutive patients with different tumors were retrospectively compared to clinical reports (bone metastases, yes/no). Statistical analysis included entity-specific receiver operating characteristics to determine optimized BSI cut-off values. In addition to prostate cancer (cut-off = 0.27%, sensitivity (SN) = 87%, specificity (SP) = 99%), the algorithm used provided comparable results for breast cancer (cut-off 0.18%, SN = 83%, SP = 87%) and colorectal cancer (cut-off = 0.10%, SN = 100%, SP = 90%). Worse performance was observed for lung cancer (cut-off = 0.06%, SN = 63%, SP = 70%) and renal cell carcinoma (cut-off = 0.30%, SN = 75%, SP = 84%). The algorithm did not perform satisfactorily in melanoma (SN = 60%). For most entities, a high negative predictive value (NPV ≥ 87.5%, melanoma 80%) was determined, whereas positive predictive value (PPV) was clinically not applicable. Automatically determined BSI showed good sensitivity and specificity in prostate cancer and various other entities. Particularly, the high NPV encourages applying BSI as a tool for computer-aided diagnostic in various tumor entities.

Citing Articles

Clinical performance of deep learning-enhanced ultrafast whole-body scintigraphy in patients with suspected malignancy.

Qi N, Pan B, Meng Q, Yang Y, Ding J, Yuan Z BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):236.

PMID: 39251959 PMC: 11385493. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01422-1.


Stability of standardized uptake values for quantitative bone SPECT for jawbone lesions: a single-center cross-sectional study.

Hata H, Shimomura S, Imamachi K, Sato J, Asaka T, Hirata K BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):305.

PMID: 38443942 PMC: 10913536. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04067-2.


Four Markers Useful for the Distinction of Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Sheep.

Wang W, Chen S, Qiao L, Zhang S, Liu Q, Yang K Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(21).

PMID: 37958061 PMC: 10648371. DOI: 10.3390/ani13213305.


Developing neural network diagnostic models and potential drugs based on novel identified immune-related biomarkers for celiac disease.

Shen T, Wang H, Hu R, Lv Y Hum Genomics. 2023; 17(1):76.

PMID: 37587523 PMC: 10433645. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-023-00526-z.


Skeleton Segmentation on Bone Scintigraphy for BSI Computation.

Yu P, Lai Y, Chen Y, Cheng D Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(13).

PMID: 37443695 PMC: 10340357. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132302.


References
1.
Anand A, Morris M, Kaboteh R, Bath L, Sadik M, Gjertsson P . Analytic Validation of the Automated Bone Scan Index as an Imaging Biomarker to Standardize Quantitative Changes in Bone Scans of Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2015; 57(1):41-5. PMC: 4975929. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160085. View

2.
Wu L, Gu H, Zheng J, Xu X, Lin L, Deng X . Diagnostic value of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 34(1):128-35. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22608. View

3.
Savelli G, Maffioli L, Maccauro M, de Deckere E, Bombardieri E . Bone scintigraphy and the added value of SPECT (single photon emission tomography) in detecting skeletal lesions. Q J Nucl Med. 2001; 45(1):27-37. View

4.
Pauwels E, Blom J, Camps J, Hermans J, Rijke A . A comparison between the diagnostic efficacy of 99mTc-MDP, 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-HDP for the detection of bone metastases. Eur J Nucl Med. 1983; 8(3):118-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF00256735. View

5.
Petersen L, Mortensen J, Bertelsen H, Zacho H . Prospective evaluation of computer-assisted analysis of skeletal lesions for the staging of prostate cancer. BMC Med Imaging. 2017; 17(1):40. PMC: 5504665. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-017-0211-y. View