» Articles » PMID: 32954911

Longitudinal Transitions in Intimate Partner Violence Among Female Assigned at Birth Sexual and Gender Minority Youth

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2020 Sep 21
PMID 32954911
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Female-assigned at birth sexual and gender minorities (FAB SGM) are at elevated risk of experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV), yet little longitudinal research has been conducted with this population. In the current study, we attempted to understand how patterns of IPV victimization and perpetration, measured across a wide range of IPV behaviors (psychological, physical, sexual, cyber, and SGM-specific), changed over time for FAB SGM youth. Participants came from a longitudinal cohort study of FAB SGM late adolescents and young adults (FAB400; = 488) and included anyone who reported a romantic partner at one of the first three waves (six months apart; = 433). Latent class analysis (LCA) was run at each wave to determine the best-fitting class structure across IPV experiences. These were followed up with latent transition analyses (LTAs) to determine patterns of movement between classes over the course of the three waves. Lastly, we looked at the effects of staying with the same romantic partner on transitions. We found that the same three-class structure replicated across all three waves of the study. That class structure identified no/low, psychological, and high IPV classes at each wave. In the LTA, when transitions occurred for FAB SGM, they were much more likely to transition to a class defined by lower likelihoods of experiencing IPV (i.e., psychological to no/low) than they were to a class defined by higher likelihoods of IPV (i.e., psychological to high). However, we found that FAB SGM youth were less likely to transition to a less severe IPV class if they maintained the same serious romantic partner across waves. This finding, in particular, suggests that IPV is often relationship specific for FAB SGM and that efforts to reduce IPV in SGM communities must consider intervening at the relationship level to effect meaningful change.

Citing Articles

Intimate Partner Violence Among Sexual Minority Women: A Scoping Review.

Porsch L, Xu M, Veldhuis C, Bochicchio L, Zollweg S, Hughes T Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022; 24(5):3014-3036.

PMID: 36154756 PMC: 10039964. DOI: 10.1177/15248380221122815.

References
1.
Martin-Storey A . Prevalence of dating violence among sexual minority youth: variation across gender, sexual minority identity and gender of sexual partners. J Youth Adolesc. 2014; 44(1):211-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-013-0089-0. View

2.
Zweig J, Dank M, Yahner J, Lachman P . The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. J Youth Adolesc. 2013; 42(7):1063-77. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8. View

3.
Newcomb M, Macapagal K, Feinstein B, Bettin E, Swann G, Whitton S . Integrating HIV Prevention and Relationship Education for Young Same-Sex Male Couples: A Pilot Trial of the 2GETHER Intervention. AIDS Behav. 2017; 21(8):2464-2478. PMC: 5549448. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-017-1674-0. View

4.
Badenes-Ribera L, Bonilla-Campos A, Frias-Navarro D, Pons-Salvador G, Monterde-I-Bort H . Intimate Partner Violence in Self-Identified Lesbians: A Systematic Review of Its Prevalence and Correlates. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2015; 17(3):284-97. DOI: 10.1177/1524838015584363. View

5.
Whitton S, Dyar C, Mustanski B, Newcomb M . Intimate Partner Violence Experiences of Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents and Young Adults Assigned Female at Birth. Psychol Women Q. 2019; 43(2):232-249. PMC: 6812525. DOI: 10.1177/0361684319838972. View