» Articles » PMID: 32953607

The Effectiveness, Risks and Improvement of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy During the Learning Curve: a Propensity Score-matched Analysis

Overview
Journal Gland Surg
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2020 Sep 21
PMID 32953607
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Propensity score-matched analyses comparing the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) that consider the effect of the learning curve for LPD are lacking. We use Propensity score-matched to compare the safety and efficacy of LPD during the learning curve to OPD.

Methods: The medical records of 296 consecutive patients who had undergone LPD or OPD between September 2016 and August 2019 at Fujian Provincial Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated with LPD were matched 1:1 to those treated with OPD. Calculation of propensity scores considered age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, pathology, incidence of obstructive jaundice, incidence of biliary drainage, pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct diameter, previous abdominal surgery, comorbidities, and case distribution of the surgical team.

Results: After propensity score matching, 196 patients were divided into two groups: 98 patients in the LPD group and 98 patients in the OPD group. LPD performed during the learning curve was associated with a longer median operative time (OT) (432 328 min, P<0.001), a higher incidence of major surgery-associated complications (32.7% 14.3%, P=0.002), a higher incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (27.6% 13.3%, P=0.013), and prolonged LOS (21.06 d 16.94 d, P=0.033), but lower median intraoperative blood loss (200 300 mL, P<0.001) compared to OPD. Mean OT and LOS were significantly shorter in the late phase of the learning curve for LPD (P<0.001), and were similar to that for OPD. Age >60 years and a non-dilated MPD were significant predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula, major surgery-associated complications, prolonged LOS and postoperative mortality at 90 days (all P<0.05).

Conclusions: OT, incidence of major surgery-associated complications, and LOS were significantly increased in patients that underwent LPD, but were significantly improved during the learning curve. Elderly patients and patients with a non-dialated MPD should not be treated with LPD performed by inexperienced surgeons.

Citing Articles

Application of 3D Printing to Design and Manufacture Pancreatic Duct Stent and Animal Experiments.

Xiang F, Yao C, Guan G, Luo F Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39451380 PMC: 11504459. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11101004.


First assistant experience in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: accelerating the learning curve for an operator.

Li D, Du C, Wang W, Zhang J, Liu J BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):92.

PMID: 37069578 PMC: 10111734. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-01987-8.


Surgical methods influence on the risk of anastomotic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Wang K, Dong S, Zhang W, Ni Y, Xie F, Wang J Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(5):3380-3397.

PMID: 36627536 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09832-4.


Laparoscopic vs. Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy After Learning Curve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Center Studies.

Feng Q, Xin Z, Qiu J, Xu M Front Surg. 2021; 8:715083.

PMID: 34568416 PMC: 8461253. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.715083.


Perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes following laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy after learning curve in the past 10 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Feng Q, Xin Z, Zhu B, Liao M, Liao W, Zeng Y Gland Surg. 2021; 10(5):1655-1668.

PMID: 34164310 PMC: 8184374. DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-916.


References
1.
Strobel O, Buchler M . Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: safety concerns and no benefits. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 4(3):186-187. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30006-8. View

2.
Kim S, Song K, Jung Y, Kim Y, Park D, Lee S . Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: improvement with surgical experience. Surg Endosc. 2012; 27(1):95-103. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2427-9. View

3.
Doula C, Kostakis I, Damaskos C, Machairas N, Vardakostas D, Feretis T . Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016; 26(1):6-16. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000228. View

4.
Adam M, Choudhury K, Dinan M, Reed S, Scheri R, Blazer 3rd D . Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer: Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients. Ann Surg. 2015; 262(2):372-7. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001055. View

5.
McCracken E, Mureebe L, Blazer 3rd D . Minimally Invasive Surgical Site Infection in Procedure-Targeted ACS NSQIP Pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Surg Res. 2018; 233:183-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.041. View