Accuracy of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Abdominal Masses in Children in Nigeria

Overview

Journal Afr J Paediatr Surg

Specialties General Surgery
Pediatrics

Date 2020 Sep 21

PMID 32952131

Citations 2

Authors

Adebayo Ayokunle Adedayo

Joseph Bako Igashi

Philip Mari Mshelbwala

Abdulrashid A Nasir

Emmanuel A Ameh

James O Adeniran

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Abdominal masses in children constitute a spectrum of lesions of diverse origin, nature and significance. In a low-income setting with limited investigative facilities, accurate diagnosis of abdominal masses can be very challenging. However, ultrasound has been used preferentially as a diagnostic tool in evaluating abdominal masses in children. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of ultrasound evaluation of abdominal masses in children.

Materials And Methods: This was a prospective descriptive study of 135 consecutive children presenting with palpable and/or suspected abdominal masses over a 1-year period at a tertiary hospital. Data analyses were done using SPSS version 17 software and level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: Abdominal mass was located in the kidney in 40 (32.3%) patients. Definitive diagnoses of abdominal masses were confirmed intraoperatively in 33 (24.4%) and by histopathological examination in 102 (75.6%) cases. Abdominal masses were detected in 124/135 (91.9%) of the participants. Ultrasound (US) correctly identified 109/124 (87.9%) of the pathologies. The sensitivity and specificity of USS were 87.9% and 81.8%, respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 97.2%-98.2% and 37.5%-45.7%, respectively. The overall US diagnostic accuracy was 87.4%. The predictive value of US for intussusceptions, Wilms' tumour and hydronephrosis was high (sensitivity was 92.0%, 95.8% and 81.1% and PPV was 90.0%, 83.0% and 93.8%, respectively). On the other hand, the sensitivity indices for appendiceal mass/abscess, lymphoma and neuroblastoma were low (28.6%, 66.7% and 57.1%, respectively), while their PPV was low too (66.7%, 42.9% and 77.7%, respectively). The PPV was especially poor for lymphoma. The specificity and NPV indices for these six disease conditions were good.

Conclusion: Ultrasound is a reliable tool in the evaluation of abdominal masses in children in this setting.

Citing Articles

Neck stiffness and bone osteolytic lesion in a 3-years old child: a case report.

Carraro C, Rabusin M, Murru F, Ammar L, Barbi E, Amaddeo A Ital J Pediatr. 2023; 49(1):132.

PMID: 37775763 PMC: 10543269. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-023-01534-4.

A National Quality Improvement Program on Ultrasound Department in China: A Controlled Cohort Study of 1297 Public Hospitals.

Tao X, Li J, Gu Y, Ma L, Xu W, Wang R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(1).

PMID: 36612718 PMC: 9819884. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010397.

References

Annuar Z, Sakijan A, Annuar N, Kooi G . Ultrasound in the diagnosis of palpable abdominal masses in children. Med J Malaysia. 1990; 45(4):281-7. View

Peng Y, Jia L, Sun N, Li J, Fu L, Zeng J . Assessment of cystic renal masses in children: comparison of multislice computed tomography and ultrasound imaging using the Bosniak classification system. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 75(3):287-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.035. View

Altman D, Bland J . Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994; 308(6943):1552. PMC: 2540489. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552. View

Barker C, Lindsell D . Ultrasound of the palpable abdominal mass. Clin Radiol. 1990; 41(2):98-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)80137-0. View

Wicks J, Silver T, Bree R . Giant cystic abdominal masses in children and adolescents: ultrasonic differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978; 130(5):853-7. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.130.5.853. View

Petrus L, Hall T, Boechat M, Westra S, Curran J, STECKEL R . The pediatric patient with suspected adrenal neoplasm: which radiological test to use?. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1992; 20(1):53-7. DOI: 10.1002/mpo.2950200111. View

Kebede A, Nigussie Y . Ultrasound evaluation of abdominal masses in Ethiopian child patients. Trop Doct. 2011; 41(3):157-9. DOI: 10.1258/td.2011.100253. View

Ahmed I, Nazir R, Chaudhary M, Kundi S . Triple assessment of breast lump. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007; 17(9):535-8. DOI: 09.2007/JCPSP.535538. View

Ko H, Schenk J, Troger J, Rohrschneider W . Current radiological management of intussusception in children. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(9):2411-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0589-y. View

10.

Hill B, Yamaguchi K, Flynn J, Miller D . Diagnostic sonography in general surgery. Arch Surg. 1975; 110(9):1089-94. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360150033006. View

11.

Glaros A, Kline R . Understanding the accuracy of tests with cutting scores: the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value model. J Clin Psychol. 1988; 44(6):1013-23. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198811)44:6<1013::aid-jclp2270440627>3.0.co;2-z. View

12.

Crane G, Hernanz-Schulman M . Current imaging assessment of congenital abdominal masses in pediatric patients. Semin Roentgenol. 2011; 47(1):32-44. DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2011.07.004. View

13.

Onur M, Bakal U, Kocakoc E, Tartar T, Kazez A . Cystic abdominal masses in children: a pictorial essay. Clin Imaging. 2012; 37(1):18-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.03.010. View

14.

Salem S, OMalley B, Hiltz C . Ultrasonographic appearance of gastrointestinal masses. J Can Assoc Radiol. 1980; 31(3):163-7. View