» Articles » PMID: 32944718

"We Have Been Magnified for Years - Now You Are Under the Microscope!": Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities Created an Online Survey to Challenge Public Understanding of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Public attitudes towards learning disabilities (LDs) are generally reported as positive, inclusive and empathetic. However, these findings do not reflect the lived experiences of people with LDs. To shed light on this disparity, a team of co-researchers with LDs created the first online survey to challenge public understanding of LDs, asking questions in ways that are important to them and represent how they see themselves. Here, we describe and evaluate the process of creating an accessible survey platform and an online survey in a research team consisting of academic and non-academic professionals with and without LDs or autism. Through this inclusive research process, the co-designed survey met the expectations of the co-researchers and was well-received by the initial survey respondents. We reflect on the co-researchers' perspectives following the study completion, and consider the difficulties and advantages we encountered deploying such approaches and their potential implications on future survey data analysis.

Citing Articles

'Building bridges': reflections and recommendations for co-producing health research.

Papageorgiou V, Dewa L, Bruton J, Murray K, Hewlett N, Thamm W Res Involv Engagem. 2023; 9(1):113.

PMID: 38057931 PMC: 10702073. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00528-0.


Supporting Remote Survey Data Analysis by Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities through Inclusive and Creative Practices and Data Science Approaches.

Chapko D, Rothstein P, Emeh L, Frumiento P, Kennedy D, McNicholas D DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf). 2021; 2021:1668-1681.

PMID: 34541585 PMC: 7611679. DOI: 10.1145/3461778.3462010.

References
1.
Ali A, Hassiotis A, Strydom A, King M . Self stigma in people with intellectual disabilities and courtesy stigma in family carers: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2012; 33(6):2122-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.06.013. View

2.
Sankhla D, Theodore K . British Attitudes Towards Sexuality in Men and Women with Intellectual Disabilities: A Comparison Between White Westerners and South Asians. Sex Disabil. 2015; 33(4):429-445. PMC: 4643113. DOI: 10.1007/s11195-015-9423-7. View

3.
Langhaug L, Cheung Y, Pascoe S, Chirawu P, Woelk G, Hayes R . How you ask really matters: randomised comparison of four sexual behaviour questionnaire delivery modes in Zimbabwean youth. Sex Transm Infect. 2010; 87(2):165-73. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2009.037374. View

4.
Bonham G, Basehart S, Schalock R, Marchand C, Kirchner N, Rumenap J . Consumer-based quality of life assessment: the Maryland ask me! Project. Ment Retard. 2004; 42(5):338-55. DOI: 10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<338:CQOLAT>2.0.CO;2. View

5.
Morin D, Rivard M, Boursier C, Crocker A, Caron J . Norms of the Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014; 59(5):462-7. DOI: 10.1111/jir.12146. View