» Articles » PMID: 32944323

Paravertebral Block with Modified Catheter Under Surgeon's Direct Vision After Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

Overview
Journal J Thorac Dis
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2020 Sep 18
PMID 32944323
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Paravertebral block (PVB) conducted by epidural catheter is a prevalent pain management for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of paravertebral block with a modified PVB (MPVB) catheter under surgeon's direct vision after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Methods: Three hundred fifty-six patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups consecutively according to the catheter applied in PVB procedure (PVB group and MPVB group). In the MPVB group, a modified catheter with a flexible forepart and more apertures distributing along the forepart than the conventional epidural catheter was introduced. An infusion pump containing of 150 mL mixture was connected to the catheter to provide sustained regional analgesia. Intramuscular dezocine 10 mg was administered as a rescue medication when necessary. Postoperative pain management effect was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and on coughing. Spirometry values and blood gas analysis were monitored and recorded for the first 3 postoperative days (PODs). Analgesia-related adverse events, characteristics of PVB procedure and postoperative major complication were also compared between the two groups.

Results: There were 172 patients who received PVB with conventional epidural catheter in the PVB group, and 184 patients were performed PVB with modified paravertebral catheter in the MPVB group. Significantly lower pain score at rest was found in MPVB group at 24 h postoperatively (P=0.006). The pain score on coughing in MPVB group was significantly lower than that in PVB group at 12 and 24 h postoperatively (P=0.037 and P<0.001, respectively). Patients needing for rescue medication was significantly lower in the MPVB group (P=0.028). The incidence of pleural perforation was lower in the MPVB group (P=0.020). Postoperative spirometry values revealed comparable pulmonary function between the two groups, and arterial blood gas analysis showed a normal range of pH and PaCO2 in both groups. There was no significant difference of analgesia-related adverse events as well as major complications between the two groups.

Conclusions: PVB with modified catheter under surgeon's direct vision was effective and safe after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Citing Articles

Adding Dexmedetomidine to Methylene Blue in Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Video-Assisted Lobectomy: A Case Series Study.

Coppolino F, Brunetti S, Bottazzo L, Cosenza G, Sansone P, Fiore M Local Reg Anesth. 2024; 17:99-105.

PMID: 39677514 PMC: 11646378. DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S487981.


Efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic-guided multiple paravertebral block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy surgery: a randomized blinded controlled study.

Li Z, Lin Q, Lin L, Wu Q, Ke P, Chen H Front Surg. 2023; 10:1267477.

PMID: 37942003 PMC: 10628487. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1267477.


Effectiveness of Surgeon-Performed Paravertebral Block Analgesia for Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Chenesseau J, Fourdrain A, Pastene B, Charvet A, Rivory A, Baumstarck K JAMA Surg. 2023; 158(12):1255-1263.

PMID: 37878299 PMC: 10600725. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5228.


Efficacy of Intrathoracic Intercostal Nerve Block on Postoperative Acute and Chronic Pains of Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.

Zhao X, Li X, Wang Y, Xiao W, Zhang B, Meng X J Pain Res. 2022; 15:2273-2281.

PMID: 35967470 PMC: 9365024. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S369042.


Regional Analgesia in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Lin J, Liao Y, Gong C, Yu L, Gao F, Yu J Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:842332.

PMID: 35463038 PMC: 9019113. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.842332.


References
1.
Elsayed H, McKevith J, McShane J, Scawn N . Thoracic epidural or paravertebral catheter for analgesia after lung resection: is the outcome different?. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011; 26(1):78-82. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.019. View

2.
Eason M, Wyatt R . Paravertebral thoracic block-a reappraisal. Anaesthesia. 1979; 34(7):638-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06363.x. View

3.
Daly D, Myles P . Update on the role of paravertebral blocks for thoracic surgery: are they worth it?. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009; 22(1):38-43. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32831a4074. View

4.
Norum H, Breivik H . A systematic review of comparative studies indicates that paravertebral block is neither superior nor safer than epidural analgesia for pain after thoracotomy. Scand J Pain. 2018; 1(1):12-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2009.10.003. View

5.
Davies R, Myles P, Graham J . A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2006; 96(4):418-26. DOI: 10.1093/bja/ael020. View