» Articles » PMID: 32943206

Increased Disease-free and Relative Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Centralized Primary Treatment

Overview
Journal Gynecol Oncol
Date 2020 Sep 18
PMID 32943206
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To analyze 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and relative survival (RS) before and after the 2011 implementation of centralized primary treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Methods: A population-based cohort study using the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecological Cancer (SQRGC). Women with FIGO stage III and IV epithelial ovarian and Fallopian tube cancers were divided into two cohorts: before and after centralization. We estimated RS using the Ederer II method, analyzed the difference in the excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) and estimated 5-year DFS in a Cox proportional hazard regression model with centralization, age, primary treatment and complete cytoreduction as variables.

Results: A total of 495 women were identified with 244 women before (2008-2010) and 251 after (2011-2013) centralization. An increased 5-year RS from 24% (95%CI:19-31) to 37% (95%CI:31-44) and an increased median RS from 27 months (95%CI:23-34) to 44 months (95%CI:40-52), p < 0.001 (log-rank), were observed in the total cohort regardless of primary treatment. EMRR was found to be 0.62 (95%CI:0.51-0.76) in 2011-2013 compared to 2008-2010 for all patients. After centralization, 5-year DFS was significantly longer, hazard ratio of 0.77 (95%CI:0.64-0.93) and centralization was found to be an independent significant factor for both survival and DFS. Complete cytoreduction was found to be a significant independent factor associated with increased RS and DFS.

Conclusion: Centralization of primary treatment of advanced ovarian cancer was associated with significantly increased complete cytoreduction, 5-year RS and DFS, and was found to be a significant independent factor for both RS and DFS.

Citing Articles

Incidental findings of borderline ovarian tumor or ovarian cancer - real-world data on surgical and oncological outcomes.

Joder C, Smaadahl-Wey C, Zumwald L, Saner F, Rauh C, Hofer S Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1450461.

PMID: 39464713 PMC: 11502289. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1450461.


Exploring the Potential Role of Upper Abdominal Peritonectomy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Cytoreductive Surgery Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence.

Laios A, Kalampokis E, Mamalis M, Thangavelu A, Hutson R, Broadhead T Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(22).

PMID: 38001646 PMC: 10670755. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225386.


A prognostic model for ovarian neoplasms established by an integrated analysis of 1580 transcriptomic profiles.

Hua Y, Cai D, Shirley C, Mo S, Chen R, Gao F Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19429.

PMID: 37940688 PMC: 10632395. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45410-x.


British Gynaecological Cancer Society Recommendations for Evidence Based, Population Data Derived Quality Performance Indicators for Ovarian Cancer.

Sundar S, Nordin A, Morrison J, Wood N, Ghaem-Maghami S, Nieto J Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36672287 PMC: 9856668. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020337.


Complications after advanced ovarian cancer surgery-A population-based cohort study.

Palmqvist C, Michaelsson H, Staf C, Johansson M, Albertsson P, Dahm-Kahler P Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022; 101(7):747-757.

PMID: 35403699 PMC: 9564567. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14355.