» Articles » PMID: 32938722

Reporting Grantee Demographics for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Neuroscience

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Sep 17
PMID 32938722
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Professional neuroscience organizations have recently pledged their commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion in examining institutional discrimination; to raise questions about how to train underrepresented scientists; and to recruit underrepresented subjects for a more equitable scientific enterprise in the 21st century. Studies have illuminated racial disparities in funding, likely because of implicit bias in the review process and differential access to resources. We propose that one concrete way to monitor and redress these disparities is to collect and publicize data on grantees by gender, race, ethnicity, and location from neuroscience funding agencies. Beyond remedying historical disadvantages, disseminating funding more equitably across recipients would be an empirical solution that can improve the very quality of neuroscience.

Citing Articles

Little transparency and equity in scientific awards for early- and mid-career researchers in ecology and evolution.

Lagisz M, Aich U, Amin B, Rutkowska J, Sanchez-Mercado A, Lara C Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(5):655-665.

PMID: 37012379 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02028-6.


Exploring the identity development of the budding neuroscientist at postgraduate level: a mixed-method study with perspectives from alumni and academics.

Sandrone S, Ntonia I BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):746.

PMID: 36307793 PMC: 9615628. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03758-0.


Diversity-related Factors in Research Mentorship and Publishing in the ACBS Community and the Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science.

Martin S, Rhodes A, Brill C, Sandoz E J Contextual Behav Sci. 2022; 26:56-62.

PMID: 36275125 PMC: 9586200. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.08.009.


Editorial: Challenges of Interdisciplinary Research in the Field of Critical (Sex/Gender) Neuroscience.

Fitsch H, Lysen F, Choudhury S Front Sociol. 2022; 6:797089.

PMID: 35097062 PMC: 8790657. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.797089.


Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.

Llorens A, Tzovara A, Bellier L, Bhaya-Grossman I, Bidet-Caulet A, Chang W Neuron. 2021; 109(13):2047-2074.

PMID: 34237278 PMC: 8553227. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002.


References
1.
Rose N . Neuroscience and the future for mental health?. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015; 25(2):95-100. PMC: 6998666. DOI: 10.1017/S2045796015000621. View

2.
Henrich J, Heine S, Norenzayan A . Most people are not WEIRD. Nature. 2010; 466(7302):29. DOI: 10.1038/466029a. View

3.
. Widening the scope of diversity. Nat Neurosci. 2020; 23(8):903. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-0670-2. View

4.
. Promoting diversity in neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2017; 21(1):1. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-017-0052-6. View

5.
Dworkin J, Linn K, Teich E, Zurn P, Shinohara R, Bassett D . The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nat Neurosci. 2020; 23(8):918-926. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y. View