» Articles » PMID: 32938599

Augmented Reality in Patient Education and Health Literacy: a Scoping Review Protocol

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Sep 17
PMID 32938599
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Health literacy enables the patients in understanding the basic healthcare information and taking informed health decisions; thus, it is a desirable goal of any healthcare system. It increases patients' adherence to treatment, improves the quality of care and eases the overall burden on the healthcare system. In recent years, technological solutions are being increasingly used in educating patients and achieving better health literacy. Augmented reality (AR) provides powerful, contextual and situated learning experiences and supplements the real world with virtual objects. AR could potentially be an effective learning methodology for the patients, thus, warranting a comprehensive overview of the current state of AR in patient education and health literacy.

Methods: The proposed scoping review will be based on the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, including the refinements suggested by Levac . A systematic search for references in the published literature will be conducted in nine research databases-Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and Association for Information Systems eLibrary (AISeL). The unpublished studies from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Conference Proceedings Citation Index and grey literature references obtained from a web search will also be included. Databases will be searched from inception to 14 January 2020. Two independent reviewers will screen the studies from the search results in two successive stages of title/abstract screening followed by full-text screening. Data variables will be extracted from the selected studies to characterise study design, type of AR technology employed and the relational factors affecting patient education. Lastly, key stakeholders will be consulted to gather their insights about the study findings.

Ethics And Dissemination: The results will be disseminated through stakeholder meetings and conference presentations. The data used are from publicly available secondary sources, so this study does not require ethical review.

Citing Articles

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Use Cases in Gastroenterology.

Yazarkan Y, Sonmez G, Gurses M, Ucdal M, Simsek C Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025; 27(1):15.

PMID: 39976780 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-00962-y.


Immersive Technologies in Healthcare: An In-Depth Exploration of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Enhancing Patient Care, Medical Education, and Training Paradigms.

Iqbal A, Aamir A, Hammad A, Hafsa H, Basit A, Oduoye M J Prim Care Community Health. 2024; 15():21501319241293311.

PMID: 39439304 PMC: 11528804. DOI: 10.1177/21501319241293311.


Effect of Augmented Reality (AR) Models on Patient Education in Preventing Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID)-Induced Acute Kidney Injury.

Sonar N, Pervaze S, Kaur G, Sadiq Z, Poobalasingham S, Sergent B Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69265.

PMID: 39403652 PMC: 11472208. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69265.


The Multidomain Metaverse Cancer Care Digital Platform: Development and Usability Study.

Kim S, Jung T, Sohn D, Chae Y, Kim Y, Kang S JMIR Serious Games. 2023; 11:e46242.

PMID: 38032697 PMC: 10722376. DOI: 10.2196/46242.


Patient Experiences With Virtual Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Phenomenological Focus Group Study.

Curran V, Hollett A, Peddle E JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e42966.

PMID: 37036827 PMC: 10154021. DOI: 10.2196/42966.


References
1.
Conde J, De S, Hall R, Johansen E, Meglan D, Peng G . Telehealth innovations in health education and training. Telemed J E Health. 2010; 16(1):103-6. PMC: 2937346. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0152. View

2.
Shuhaiber J . Augmented reality in surgery. Arch Surg. 2004; 139(2):170-4. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.170. View

3.
Siedner M, Haberer J, Bwana M, Ware N, Bangsberg D . High acceptability for cell phone text messages to improve communication of laboratory results with HIV-infected patients in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional survey study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12:56. PMC: 3470938. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-56. View

4.
Behar-Horenstein L, Guin P, Gamble K, Hurlock G, Leclear E, Philipose M . Improving patient care through patient-family education programs. Hosp Top. 2005; 83(1):21-7. DOI: 10.3200/HTPS.83.1.21-27. View

5.
Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J . Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:50. PMC: 2736161. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50. View