» Articles » PMID: 32936390

Cholecystectomy Using the Revo-i Robotic Surgical System from Korea: the First Clinical Study

Overview
Journal Updates Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Sep 16
PMID 32936390
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the newly developed Revo-i (Meerecompany, Yongin, Republic of Korea) robotic surgical system during robot-assisted cholecystectomy. This prospective, phase I clinical study involved 15 patients with gallbladder-related disease. The primary outcome evaluated was the intraoperative safety of the Revo-i; the secondary outcomes measured were the 30-day postoperative complications and patient satisfaction with the Revo-i's performance. Between August 17 and December 23, 2016, we performed 15 robot-assisted cholecystectomies. The operations were successfully completed, without any conversions to open or laparoscopic approaches. The mean patient age (53.07 years), mean operative time (115.3 ± 17.31 min [± standard deviation]), docking time (10.6 ± 3.16 min), console time (49.7 ± 15.41 min), actual dissection time (33.1 ± 10.53 min), and estimated blood loss (3.33 ± 6.17 mL) were determined. There were no intra- or postoperative complications, including gallbladder perforations. The mean hospital stay was 2.0 ± 1.00 days. Most patients reported satisfaction with the Revo-i's performance. Performing robot-assisted cholecystectomies using the Revo-i is feasible and safe. This report describes the first clinical study of the Revo-i robotic surgical system in human patients.

Citing Articles

ArtiSential laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis with robotic single-port cholecystectomy.

Rho S, Choi M, Kim S, Hong S, Goh B, Nagakawa Y Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024; 107(6):336-345.

PMID: 39669386 PMC: 11634393. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.6.336.


A right colectomy case study: transitioning to the Hugo RAS system with a novel 3-ports technique in experienced robotic colorectal practice.

Violante T, Rottoli M, Colpaert J, Poortmans M, Boterbergh K, Potvlieghe P Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):368.

PMID: 39621155 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03559-7.


Cholecystectomy with the Hugo™ robotic-assisted surgery system: the first general surgery clinical study in Korea.

Kwon W, Jang J, Jeong C, Anselme S, Pradella F, Woods J Surg Endosc. 2024; 39(1):171-179.

PMID: 39466427 PMC: 11666616. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11334-4.


The Revo-i Robotic Surgical System in Advanced Pancreatic Surgery: A Second Non-Randomized Clinical Trial and Comparative Analysis to the da Vinci™ System.

Kim J, Choi M, Hwang H, Lee W, Kang C Yonsei Med J. 2024; 65(3):148-155.

PMID: 38373834 PMC: 10896669. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0140.


Evaluation status of current and emerging minimally invasive robotic surgical platforms.

Boal M, Di Girasole C, Tesfai F, Morrison T, Higgs S, Ahmad J Surg Endosc. 2023; 38(2):554-585.

PMID: 38123746 PMC: 10830826. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10554-4.


References
1.
Kim J, Kim N, Lee K, Hur H, Min B, Kim J . A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19(8):2485-93. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1. View

2.
Hagen M, Pugin F, Chassot G, Huber O, Buchs N, Iranmanesh P . Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2011; 22(1):52-61. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0422-1. View

3.
Lee J, Chung W . Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection: past, present, and future. Cancer J. 2013; 19(2):151-61. DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31828aab61. View

4.
Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen R, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham J . Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012; 62(3):431-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044. View

5.
Weinberg L, Rao S, Escobar P . Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011; 2011:852061. PMC: 3236390. DOI: 10.1155/2011/852061. View