» Articles » PMID: 32935909

A Split Strategy to Prevent Cytomegalovirus After Kidney Transplantation Using Prophylaxis in Serological High-risk Patients and a Pre-emptive Strategy in Intermediate-risk Patients: Combining the Best of Two Options?

Overview
Date 2020 Sep 16
PMID 32935909
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains an important challenge after kidney transplantation. Current Transplantation Society International Consensus Guidelines recommend antiviral prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy for high-risk CMV-seronegative recipients with a CMV-seropositive donor (D+/R-) and moderate-risk CMV-seropositive recipients (R+). However, a split strategy according to CMV serostatus is not specifically mentioned.

Methods: We evaluated a split strategy to prevent CMV infection after kidney transplantation in which D+/R- patients received valganciclovir (VGC) prophylaxis for 200 days, and R + patients were treated pre-emptively according to CMV DNAemia. Patients were followed until 1-year post-transplant.

Results: Between April 2014 and March 2018, 40 D+/R- and 92 R + patients underwent kidney transplantation. Forty-six percent received antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction, and 98% was treated with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolic acid (MPA), and steroids. No D+/R- patient developed CMV disease during prophylaxis (median 200 days), but 15% developed post-prophylaxis or late-onset disease. Fifty-three percent developed neutropenia during prophylaxis, including 16/40 (40%) grade 3 or 4 neutropenia requiring reduction/discontinuation of MPA (30%) and/or VGC (35%), and an occasional need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5%). In the R + group, 40% received antiviral therapy for a median duration of 21 days; 5% developed early-onset CMV disease. Only 5% developed neutropenia. D+/R + status (hazard ratio (HR) 2.09,P = .004) and ATG use (HR 2.81, P < .0001) were risk factors for CMV reactivation.

Conclusions: Prophylaxis leads to acceptable CMV control in high-risk patients but comes with a high risk of neutropenia. Pre-emptive therapy is effective and limits drug exposure in those at lower risk of CMV.

Citing Articles

Approaches and Challenges in the Current Management of Cytomegalovirus in Transplant Recipients: Highlighting the Role of Advanced Practice Providers (Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants).

Cochran W, Dioverti M, Langlee J, Barker L, Shedeck A, Toman L Ann Transplant. 2024; 29:e941185.

PMID: 38650316 PMC: 11055468. DOI: 10.12659/AOT.941185.


A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Optimized CMV Preemptive Therapy and Antiviral Prophylaxis for CMV Disease Prevention in CMV High-Risk (D+R-) Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Kumar L, Murray-Krezan C, Singh N, Brennan D, Rakita R, Dasgupta S Transplant Direct. 2023; 9(8):e1514.

PMID: 37456587 PMC: 10348730. DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001514.


Decreased incidence of acute rejection without increased incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in kidney transplant recipients receiving rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin without CMV prophylaxis - a cohort single-center study.

de Paula M, Bowring M, Shaffer A, Garonzik-Wang J, Bessa A, Felipe C Transpl Int. 2020; 34(2):339-352.

PMID: 33314321 PMC: 8573716. DOI: 10.1111/tri.13800.