» Articles » PMID: 32932836

Periodic Revisions of the International Choices Criteria: Process and Results

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2020 Sep 16
PMID 32932836
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unhealthy diets contribute to an increased risk of non-communicable diseases, which are the leading causes of deaths worldwide. Nutrition policies such as front-of-pack labeling have been developed and implemented globally in different countries to stimulate healthier diets. The Choices Programme, including the International Choices criteria, is an established tool to support the implementation of such policies. The Choices criteria were developed to define the healthier choices per product group, taking saturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids, sodium, sugars, energy, and fiber into account. To keep these criteria updated, they are periodically revised by an independent international scientific committee. This paper explains the most important changes resulting from revisions between 2010 and 2016 and describes the process of the latest revision, resulting in the International Choices criteria version 2019. Revisions were based on national and international nutrition and dietary recommendations, large food composition databases, and stakeholders' feedback. Other nutrient profiling systems served as benchmarks. The product group classification was adapted and new criteria were determined in order to enhance global applicability and form a credible, intuitively logical system for users. These newly developed criteria will serve as an international standard for healthier products and provide a guiding framework for food and nutrition policies.

Citing Articles

Uptake of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling Scheme after 5 Years of Adoption in Thailand: An Analysis of New Launched Pre-Packaged Food and Beverages Products.

Nguyen Ngoc H, Photi J, Tangsuphoom N, Kriengsinyos W Nutrients. 2023; 15(14).

PMID: 37513534 PMC: 10385136. DOI: 10.3390/nu15143116.


Comparison between the Choices Five-Level Criteria and Nutri-Score: Alignment with the Dutch Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.

Konings J, Smorenburg H, Roodenburg A Nutrients. 2022; 14(17).

PMID: 36079785 PMC: 9460444. DOI: 10.3390/nu14173527.


Key Stakeholder Perspectives on Introducing a Front-of-Pack Labelling Scheme on Packaged Foods in China: A Qualitative Study.

Yin X, Ye L, Xin X, Xiang L, Yu Y, Yan R Nutrients. 2022; 14(3).

PMID: 35276875 PMC: 8840240. DOI: 10.3390/nu14030516.


Development of the Choices 5-Level Criteria to Support Multiple Food System Actions.

Tognon G, Beltramo B, Schilpzand R, Lissner L, Roodenburg A, Don R Nutrients. 2021; 13(12).

PMID: 34960059 PMC: 8705685. DOI: 10.3390/nu13124509.

References
1.
Vyth E, Steenhuis I, Roodenburg A, Brug J, Seidell J . Front-of-pack nutrition label stimulates healthier product development: a quantitative analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7:65. PMC: 2945986. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-65. View

2.
de Ruyter J, Olthof M, Seidell J, Katan M . A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(15):1397-406. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203034. View

3.
Mattes R, Campbell W . Effects of food form and timing of ingestion on appetite and energy intake in lean young adults and in young adults with obesity. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109(3):430-7. PMC: 2680008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.11.031. View

4.
Lobach A, Roberts A, Rowland I . Assessing the in vivo data on low/no-calorie sweeteners and the gut microbiota. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018; 124:385-399. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.12.005. View

5.
Payne C, Scarborough P, Rayner M, Nonaka K . Are edible insects more or less 'healthy' than commonly consumed meats? A comparison using two nutrient profiling models developed to combat over- and undernutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015; 70(3):285-91. PMC: 4781901. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.149. View