» Articles » PMID: 32923024

Development of a Questionnaire to Assess Patient Priorities in Hip Fracture Care

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2020 Sep 14
PMID 32923024
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are becoming well recognized as an important component of health care outcomes and determinants of value in patient-centered care. Yet, there is emerging recognition that guidance is lacking in the utilization of PROMs in hip fracture patients. The aim of this study was to collect input from hip fracture patients and their health care advocates as proxies to identify outcomes that are important and to gain insight into which ones are of greatest importance.

Methods: A cross-section of patients aged 65 and older treated for hip fractures at a single level 1 trauma center within the previous 3 to 9 months was identified. Semistructured telephone interviews of patients and/or health care proxies were performed in 2 phases: (1) concept identification and conceptual framework development and (2) item generation and assessment of relative importance of health care outcomes. Each phase was completed by separate patient cohorts.

Results: Sixty-four interviews were completed. Eighteen interviews with 13 patients and 5 proxies were completed for . Forty-six interviews with 33 patients and 13 proxies were completed for the . Care team and communication were reported as important in hip fracture patients. Physical outcomes were ranked as most important by only 9% of respondents. "Having confidence that I/my loved one received the best care possible" was perceived as very important by 98% of respondents and "Having access to the surgeon" was perceived as very important by 76% of the respondents.

Conclusions: In our study, communication between patients and care providers as well as collaboration among patients' care providers ranked as the most important postoperative preferences in our cohort. Notably, physical outcomes were ranked as most important by only 9% of respondents.

Citing Articles

Hip fracture has profound psychosocial impacts: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Taylor N, Rimayanti M, Peiris C, Snowdon D, Harding K, Semciw A Age Ageing. 2024; 53(9).

PMID: 39238124 PMC: 11377188. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae194.


Beyond Mortality: Severely Frail Femur Fracture Patients Can Regain Independence after Surgery.

Ponds N, Raats J, Brameier D, Schuijt H, Cooper L, Sagona A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892908 PMC: 11172540. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113197.


Hip Fracture Care in Parkinson Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of 1,239 Patients.

Huyke-Hernandez F, Parashos S, Schroder L, Switzer J Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2022; 13:21514593221118225.

PMID: 35967748 PMC: 9364183. DOI: 10.1177/21514593221118225.

References
1.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

2.
MAHONEY F, BARTHEL D . FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965; 14:61-5. View

3.
Katz S, Ford A, Moskowitz R, Jackson B, JAFFE M . STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. JAMA. 1963; 185:914-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. View

4.
Mundi S, Chaudhry H, Bhandari M . Systematic review on the inclusion of patients with cognitive impairment in hip fracture trials: a missed opportunity?. Can J Surg. 2014; 57(4):E141-5. PMC: 4119128. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.023413. View

5.
Bellamy N, BUCHANAN W, Goldsmith C, Campbell J, Stitt L . Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988; 15(12):1833-40. View