» Articles » PMID: 32922146

Statistical Field Calibration of a Low-cost PM Monitoring Network in Baltimore

Overview
Date 2020 Sep 14
PMID 32922146
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Low-cost air pollution monitors are increasingly being deployed to enrich knowledge about ambient air-pollution at high spatial and temporal resolutions. However, unlike regulatory-grade (FEM or FRM) instruments, universal quality standards for low-cost sensors are yet to be established and their data quality varies widely. This mandates thorough evaluation and calibration before any responsible use of such data. This study presents evaluation and field-calibration of the PM data from a network of low-cost monitors currently operating in Baltimore, MD, which has only one regulatory PM monitoring site within city limits. Co-location analysis at this regulatory site in Oldtown, Baltimore revealed high variability and significant overestimation of PM levels by the raw data from these monitors. Universal laboratory corrections reduced the bias in the data, but only partially mitigated the high variability. Eight months of field co-location data at Oldtown were used to develop a gain-offset calibration model, recast as a multiple linear regression. The statistical model offered substantial improvement in prediction quality over the raw or lab-corrected data. The results were robust to the choice of the low-cost monitor used for field-calibration, as well as to different seasonal choices of training period. The raw, lab-corrected and statistically-calibrated data were evaluated for a period of two months following the training period. The statistical model had the highest agreement with the reference data, producing a 24-hour average root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of around 2 . To assess transferability of the calibration equations to other monitors in the network, a cross-site evaluation was conducted at a second co-location site in suburban Essex, MD. The statistically calibrated data once again produced the lowest RMSE. The calibrated PM readings from the monitors in the low-cost network provided insights into the intra-urban spatiotemporal variations of PM in Baltimore.

Citing Articles

A causal machine-learning framework for studying policy impact on air pollution: a case study in COVID-19 lockdowns.

Heffernan C, Koehler K, Zamora M, Buehler C, Gentner D, Peng R Am J Epidemiol. 2024; 194(1):185-194.

PMID: 38960671 PMC: 11735973. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwae171.


A DYNAMIC SPATIAL FILTERING APPROACH TO MITIGATE UNDERESTIMATION BIAS IN FIELD CALIBRATED LOW-COST SENSOR AIR POLLUTION DATA.

Heffernan C, PenG R, Gentner D, Koehler K, Datta A Ann Appl Stat. 2024; 17(4):3056-3087.

PMID: 38646662 PMC: 11031266. DOI: 10.1214/23-aoas1751.


Evaluation of Calibration Approaches for Indoor Deployments of PurpleAir Monitors.

Koehler K, Wilks M, Green T, Rule A, Zamora M, Buehler C Atmos Environ (1994). 2023; 310.

PMID: 37901719 PMC: 10609655. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119944.


Enhancing the reliability of particulate matter sensing by multivariate Tobit model using weather and air quality data.

Won W, Noh J, Oh R, Lee W, Lee J, Su P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):13150.

PMID: 37573439 PMC: 10423292. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40468-z.


Identifying optimal co-location calibration periods for low-cost sensors.

Zamora M, Buehler C, Datta A, Gentner D, Koehler K Atmos Meas Tech. 2023; 16(1):169-179.

PMID: 37323467 PMC: 10270383. DOI: 10.5194/amt-16-169-2023.


References
1.
Marr L, Harley R . Modeling the effect of weekday-weekend differences in motor vehicle emissions on photochemical air pollution in central California. Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36(19):4099-106. DOI: 10.1021/es020629x. View

2.
Dominici F, Peng R, Bell M, Pham L, McDermott A, Zeger S . Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. JAMA. 2006; 295(10):1127-34. PMC: 3543154. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1127. View

3.
Carvlin G, Lugo H, Olmedo L, Bejarano E, Wilkie A, Meltzer D . Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2017; 67(12):1342-1352. PMC: 6179905. DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2017.1369471. View

4.
Trasande L, Malecha P, Attina T . Particulate Matter Exposure and Preterm Birth: Estimates of U.S. Attributable Burden and Economic Costs. Environ Health Perspect. 2016; 124(12):1913-1918. PMC: 5132647. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1510810. View

5.
Samet J, Zeger S, Dominici F, Curriero F, Coursac I, Dockery D . The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study. Part II: Morbidity and mortality from air pollution in the United States. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2001; 94(Pt 2):5-70; discussion 71-9. View