» Articles » PMID: 32919780

Malnutrition in Elective Surgery: How Traditional Markers Might Be Failing Surgeons and Patients

Overview
Journal Surgery
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Sep 13
PMID 32919780
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Serologic and anthropometric measures are commonly used as surrogate markers of nutritional status in clinical practice. In 2012, leading dietetic organizations published a standard definition of malnutrition based on clinical characteristics. We hypothesize that surrogate markers underrecognize clinical malnutrition and do not accurately identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes.

Methods: A single-institution cohort study of elective surgical inpatients from August 2015 to November 2017. Nutritional assessment was completed by trained registered dietitians using leading dietetic guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between malnutrition and perioperative outcomes.

Results: Among 953 elective surgical admissions, 456 underwent full clinical nutritional assessment. Of these, 202 (44.3%) met malnutrition criteria. In addition, 20.3% of patients with clinical malnutrition were underweight (<18.5 kg/m) and 38.1% had a serum albumin <3.0 g/dL. Compared with nonmalnourished patients, those with clinical malnutrition had higher rates of any complication (46.5% vs 37.8%, P = .06), overall infectious complications (26.2% vs 14.6%, P = .002), surgical site infections (9.4% vs 3.9%, P = .02), and mortality (8.9% vs 1.9%, P = .001). Clinical malnutrition was associated with death (odds ratio 3.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-12.54), overall infectious complication (odds ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.94), and surgical site infections (odds ratio 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-6.22).

Conclusion: In this cohort of elective surgical patients, traditional markers failed to identify malnutrition in a substantial portion of patients who met clinical malnutrition criteria. Clinical malnutrition assessment is effective in identifying patients who may be at risk for suboptimal outcomes. Surgeons should implement clinical nutritional assessment and factor that information into their preoperative evaluation and management of elective surgical patients.

Citing Articles

The use of the ERAS protocol in malnourished and properly nourished patients undergoing elective surgery: a questionnaire study.

Kutnik P, Bierut M, Rypulak E, Trwoga A, Wroblewska K, Marzeda P Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2024; 55(5):330-334.

PMID: 38282499 PMC: 10801458. DOI: 10.5114/ait.2023.134190.


Development of a nutritional screening and assessment indicator system for patients with esophageal cancer in China: Findings from the Delphi method.

Shang J, Dong W, Huang P, Sun Y, He Y, Li H Cancer Med. 2023; 12(23):21240-21255.

PMID: 37990781 PMC: 10726821. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6703.


Malnutrition risk in elective surgery patients and effectiveness of preoperative nutritional interventions at a pre-anaesthetic clinic: a 4-year apart, single-centre, observational study.

Kutnik P, Wichowska O, Sysiak-Slawecka J, Szczukocka M, Rypulak E, Piwowarczyk P Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2023; 55(3):179-185.

PMID: 37728445 PMC: 10496095. DOI: 10.5114/ait.2023.130632.


Optimizing Nutritional Status of Patients Prior to Major Surgical Intervention.

Sanchez Leon R, Rajaraman A, Kubwimana M Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2023; 19(4):85-96.

PMID: 37547903 PMC: 10402792. DOI: 10.14797/mdcvj.1248.


Perioperative Nutritional Considerations in Colon and Rectal Surgery.

Curran T Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023; 36(3):192-197.

PMID: 37113286 PMC: 10125286. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761152.